Bishop Fox bug bounty programs
bishopfox.com Updated
Bishop Fox runs one public program: a self-hosted disclosure program with no cash rewards.
- Top reward
- No cash
- Disclosure only
- Programs
- 1
- None pays cash
- Targets in scope
- 0
- Not listed publicly
- Last change
- None yet
- Tracked since Nov 2026
Where to report
The one public program Bishop Fox runs.
| Program | Top reward | Safe harbor | KYC | First response | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bishop Fox
Self-hosted · Disclosure only |
No cash | – | – | – | Open |
Amounts are the top reward per severity in the currency each program pays. First response is the platform's measured average when it publishes one, else what the policy promises.
What is in scope
What each program lets you test.
None of these programs lists its targets publicly. Each program's policy says what you may test.
Recent changes
Reward and scope changes across every Bishop Fox program, newest first.
No changes recorded yet. New targets and reward moves show up here and in the RSS feed.
Recent CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in Bishop Fox products, from the NVD.
-
CVE-2026-34227 Medium
Sliver is a command and control framework that uses a custom Wireguard netstack. Prior to version 1.7.4, a single click on a malicious link gives an unauthenticated attacker immediate, silent control over every active C2 session or beacon, capable of exfiltrating all collected target data (e.g. SSH keys, ntds.dit) or destroying the entire compromised infrastructure, entirely through the operator's
-
CVE-2026-32941 Medium
Sliver is a command and control framework that uses a custom Wireguard netstack. Versions 1.7.3 and below contain a Remote OOM (Out-of-Memory) vulnerability in the Sliver C2 server's mTLS and WireGuard C2 transport layer. The socketReadEnvelope and socketWGReadEnvelope functions trust an attacker-controlled 4-byte length prefix to allocate memory, with ServerMaxMessageSize allowing single allocati
-
CVE-2026-29781 Low
Sliver is a command and control framework that uses a custom Wireguard netstack. In versions from 1.7.3 and prior, a vulnerability exists in the Sliver C2 server's Protobuf unmarshalling logic due to a systemic lack of nil-pointer validation. By extracting valid implant credentials and omitting nested fields in a signed message, an authenticated actor can trigger an unhandled runtime panic. Becaus
-
CVE-2026-25791 High
Sliver is a command and control framework that uses a custom Wireguard netstack. Prior to 1.7.0, the DNS C2 listener accepts unauthenticated TOTP bootstrap messages and allocates server-side DNS sessions without validating OTP values, even when EnforceOTP is enabled. Because sessions are stored without a cleanup/expiry path in this flow, an unauthenticated remote actor can repeatedly create sessio
-
CVE-2026-25760 Medium
Sliver is a command and control framework that uses a custom Wireguard netstack. Prior to 1.6.11, a path traversal in the website content subsystem lets an authenticated operator read arbitrary files on the Sliver server host. This is an authenticated path traversal / arbitrary file read issue, and it can expose credentials, configs, and keys. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.6.11.
-
CVE-2025-27090 Medium
Sliver is an open source cross-platform adversary emulation/red team framework, it can be used by organizations of all sizes to perform security testing. The reverse port forwarding in sliver teamserver allows the implant to open a reverse tunnel on the sliver teamserver without verifying if the operator instructed the implant to do so. The only impact that has been shown is the exposure of the se
-
CVE-2023-34758 High
Sliver from v1.5.x to v1.5.39 has an improper cryptographic implementation, which allows attackers to execute a man-in-the-middle attack via intercepted and crafted responses.
About this page
This page gathers every public program listed under bishopfox.com: platform programs, self-hosted policies and security.txt contacts. Each program's own policy decides what is in scope and what it pays; check it before you test.
Something wrong or missing? Report a correction.