Skip to content

Devolutions Inc. bug bounty programs

devolutions.net Updated

Devolutions Inc. runs one public program: a security.txt bug bounty paying up to $5,000.

Top reward
$5,000
security.txt
Programs
1
1 pays cash
Targets in scope
10
2 types
Last change
12 Nov 2026
3 hours ago

Where to report

The one public program Devolutions Inc. runs.

Amounts are the top reward per severity in the currency each program pays. First response is the platform's measured average when it publishes one, else what the policy promises.

What is in scope

10 targets.

  • devolutions.com

    Domains

  • devolutions.net

    Domains

  • the devolutions.net website and blog

    Domains

  • Devolutions Cloud

    Products and areas

  • Devolutions Crypto

    Products and areas

  • Devolutions Gateway

    Products and areas

  • Devolutions Portal and Devolutions Account

    Products and areas

  • Devolutions Send

    Products and areas

  • Devolutions Server

    Products and areas

  • Remote Desktop Manager (Windows)

    Products and areas

No target matches. Try part of a host name, such as the company name.

Recent changes

Reward and scope changes across every Devolutions Inc. program, newest first.

All changes · RSS feed

Recent CVEs

Published vulnerabilities in Devolutions Inc. products, from the NVD.

Search NVD
  • Cleartext storage of sensitive information in the user account data in Devolutions Server 2026.3.12.0 and earlier allows an attacker with read access to the database or a database backup to obtain users' TOTP shared secrets via the unencrypted copy of the security key written when an administrator saves a user.

  • Cleartext transmission of sensitive information in the email configuration test in Devolutions Server 2026.3.13.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user with access to the test action to obtain the stored SMTP password via a request that names an attacker-controlled SMTP host.

  • Server-side request forgery in the Active Directory credential validation in Devolutions Server 2026.3.12.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to capture the NetNTLMv2 hash of the DVLS service account via an attacker-controlled domain name in the request.

  • Insertion of sensitive information into sent data in the identity provider user synchronization in Devolutions Server 2026.3.13.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user with the delegated permission to update users from the identity provider to obtain other users' MFA secrets via the synchronization API response.

  • Improper release of expired privileged access checkouts in the PAM scheduled check-in task in Devolutions Server 2025.3.2.0 through 2026.2.22.0 allows an authenticated user with checkout rights on a PAM account to retain access to that account on the target system after the checkout expires via a backlog of 21 or more newer active checkouts that prevents the expired checkout from being checked in

  • Improper access control in asset contact password in Devolutions Server 2026.3.8.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user with general Edit but without Edit asset permission to modify the asset contact password via a crafted direct request to the partial-save endpoint.

  • Improperly controlled modification of JIT elevation settings in PAM checkout in Devolutions Server 2026.3.8.0 and earlier allows an authenticated user with PAM checkout access to delete arbitrary Active Directory groups or retain elevated privileges via client-supplied JIT elevation settings in a checkout update request.

  • Server-side request forgery in PingOne groups endpoint in Devolutions Server 2026.3.8.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to exfiltrate the stored PingOne application secret via an attacker-controlled PingOne configuration in the request parameter.

About this page

This page gathers every public program listed under devolutions.net: platform programs, self-hosted policies and security.txt contacts. Each program's own policy decides what is in scope and what it pays; check it before you test.

Something wrong or missing? Report a correction.