Autodesk
Vulnerability disclosure program on HackerOne autodesk.com
- Top reward
- No cash rewards
- Top severity paid
- Critical
- Assets in scope
- 1
- Public CVEs
- 60
- Last change
At a glance
What to know before you start testing.
- No cash rewards
- A disclosure program: you report for credit, not money.
- Report on HackerOne
- Submit through the program page.
- Full safe harbor
- Good-faith research is authorised; no legal action.
- Replies within 2 days
- As the policy promises.
- Publish after a fix
- Coordinate the timing with the company.
Rewards
What HackerOne lists as the payout for each severity.
This program does not pay cash rewards.
- Pays cash
-
No
Submissions to Autodesk’s VDP are ***not eligible*** for monetary rewards.
- Response
-
Within 2 days
|**First Response**|2 days|
- Safe harbor
-
Full
We consider Good Faith Security Research to be authorized activity that is protected from adversarial legal action by us.
- Hall of fame
-
Yes
researchers will receive acknowledgement for their contributions.
Summarised with AI from the program policy on HackerOne, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Scope
1 asset you may test.
Wildcard domains 1
- * Critical No bounty
Rules
What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Autodesk (via HackerOne)'s policy.
While testing
-
Social engineering tactics (e.g. phishing, vishing, smishing) are strictly prohibited.
-
Avoid privacy violations, destruction of data, or service interruption or degradation.
-
Do not use high volume scanners or automated testing tools, as these may be flagged as malicious and result in suspension of your account or banning your IP address.
-
Do not publicly disclose vulnerabilities identified in the Autodesk VDP program until Autodesk has remediated the vulnerability and validated that the remediation was successful.
-
Ensure your testing does not negatively impact other users or systems.
-
Do not access data beyond what is necessary to demonstrate the vulnerability.
Not accepted
-
Denial of service attacks (including DoS, DDoS).
-
Spamming or flooding systems with automated requests.
-
Physical attack against Autodesk properties, data centers, or facilities.
-
Reports from web crawlers or archivers such as URLs in Wayback Machine.
Summarised with AI from the program policy on HackerOne, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Changes
Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 30 minutes ago.
No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.
Before we tracked it
Scope and reward changes recorded before this page started tracking it.
-
Scope added
*.
-
Scope removed
https://stg-manage.autodesk.com/usage-report-v2 (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
https://profile-stg.autodesk.com/security (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
http://quote.oc.autodesk.com/ (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
https://checkoutservice-stg.autodesk.com (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
https://amart.oc.autodesk.com (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
app.formit.autodesk.com/ (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
http://www.gcpay.com/ (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
https://payment-profile-gateway.ocstg.autodesk.com/v1 (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
https://gcpay.com/ (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
https://payment-profile-gateway.oc.autodesk.com (out of scope)
Public CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.
| CVE | Summary | Severity | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-7455 | A maliciously crafted FLT file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 24 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-19568 | A maliciously crafted SVG file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 24 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-16783 | A maliciously crafted ABC file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 24 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-16782 | A maliciously crafted SVG file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | Medium 5.3 | 24 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-16781 | A maliciously crafted SVG file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can trigger an Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause the application to terminate unexpectedly, resulting in a denial-of-service. | Medium 5.5 | 24 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-14478 | A maliciously created executable, when executed on the victim's machine, may allow a local low-privileged attacker to inject unauthenticated IPC messages into named pipes, modify pipe permissions or ownership, and potentially impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | High 7.8 | 12 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-14479 | A maliciously crafted input, when processed by the Autodesk Installer IPC frame parser, may trigger improper validation of an input-specified position or offset, resulting in an out-of-range substring operation. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM service to terminate unexpectedly, resulting in a denial-of-service condition. | Medium 5.5 | 12 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-7406 | A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 6 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-8325 | A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 6 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-7405 | A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service | Medium 5.5 | 6 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-1289 | A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force a Use-After-Free vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, disclose sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 6 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-11803 | A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 6 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-10710 | A maliciously crafted FBX file, when parsed through Autodesk FBX SDK, can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in fbxsdk::ExtractDrive. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 4 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-10709 | A maliciously crafted FBX file, when parsed through Autodesk FBX SDK, can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in fbxsdk::FbxIO::BinaryReadSectionHeader. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 4 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-16465 | A maliciously crafted DWG or DXF file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash or disclose sensitive information. | Medium 6.1 | 29 Jul 2026 |
| CVE-2026-17550 | A maliciously crafted DWG or DXF file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash or disclose sensitive information. | Medium 5.5 | 29 Jul 2026 |
| CVE-2026-16463 | A maliciously crafted DXF file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 29 Jul 2026 |
| CVE-2026-10789 | A maliciously crafted webpage, when visited by a user with Autodesk Fusion Desktop running and the MCP extension enabled, can trigger a vulnerability in the MCP extension that could allow arbitrary code execution. A successful exploit may allow code to execute with the privileges of the current user. | Critical 9.6 | 22 Jun 2026 |
| CVE-2026-1288 | A maliciously crafted RFA file, when converted to FormIt via “Convert RFA to FormIt” in Autodesk Revit, can force a NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the application to crash, leading to a denial-of-service condition. | Medium 5.5 | 17 Jun 2026 |
| CVE-2026-7451 | A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 26 May 2026 |
| CVE-2026-7454 | A maliciously crafted WRL file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 26 May 2026 |
| CVE-2026-7453 | A maliciously crafted WRL file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can cause a Stack Exhaustion vulnerability, leading to a denial-of-service condition. | Medium 5.5 | 26 May 2026 |
| CVE-2026-7452 | A maliciously crafted WRL file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 26 May 2026 |
| CVE-2026-7450 | A maliciously crafted PAR file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force a NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the application to crash, leading to a denial-of-service condition. | Medium 5.5 | 26 May 2026 |
| CVE-2026-4345 | A maliciously crafted HTML payload, stored in a design name and exported to CSV, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.1 | 14 Apr 2026 |
| CVE-2026-4369 | A maliciously crafted HTML payload in an assembly variant name, when displayed during the delete confirmation dialog and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.1 | 14 Apr 2026 |
| CVE-2026-4344 | A maliciously crafted HTML payload in a component name, when displayed during the delete confirmation dialog and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.1 | 14 Apr 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0875 | A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 18 Feb 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0874 | A maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 18 Feb 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0536 | A maliciously crafted GIF file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can cause a Stack-Based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 4 Feb 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0662 | A maliciously crafted project directory, when opening a max file in Autodesk 3ds Max, could lead to execution of arbitrary code in the context of the current process due to an Untrusted Search Path being utilized. | High 7.8 | 4 Feb 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0661 | A maliciously crafted RGB file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 8.4 | 4 Feb 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0660 | A maliciously crafted GIF file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can cause a Stack-Based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 8.4 | 4 Feb 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0538 | A maliciously crafted GIF file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 8.4 | 4 Feb 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0537 | A maliciously crafted RGB file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 8.4 | 4 Feb 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0535 | A maliciously crafted HTML payload, stored in a component’s description and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 8.1 | 22 Jan 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0534 | A maliciously crafted HTML payload, stored in a part’s attribute and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 8.1 | 22 Jan 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0533 | A maliciously crafted HTML payload in a design name, when displayed during the delete confirmation dialog and clicked by a user, can trigger a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Autodesk Fusion desktop application. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to read local files or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 8.1 | 22 Jan 2026 |
| CVE-2025-9459 | A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-9460 | A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-9457 | A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-9452 | A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-9456 | A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-9455 | A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-9454 | A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-9453 | A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-14593 | A maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10888 | AA maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10900 | AA maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10899 | AA maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10898 | A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10889 | A maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10887 | A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10882 | A maliciously crafted X_T file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10886 | A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10884 | AA maliciously crafted CATPART file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10883 | A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-10881 | A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 16 Dec 2025 |
| CVE-2025-11797 | A maliciously crafted DWG file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force a Use-After-Free vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 12 Nov 2025 |
| CVE-2025-11795 | A maliciously crafted JPG file, when parsed through Autodesk 3ds Max, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | High 7.8 | 12 Nov 2025 |
Original policy
Copied from hackerone.com on 12 Nov 2026. The summaries on this page are made from it; the live page may have changed since.
Autodesk is dedicated to ensuring the security of our products and services. We welcome the security community’s contributions to help safeguard Autodesk and customer data. This policy outlines how vulnerabilities can be reported and how Autodesk handles submissions.
Table of Content
- Response Targets
- Our Process
- Program Rules
- Priority
- Scope
- Program Exclusion
- Eligibility
- Disclosure
- Rewards
- Safe Harbor
Response Targets
Autodesk targets the following SLAs for researchers participating in our program:
| Type of Response | SLA in business days |
|---|---|
| First Response | 2 days |
| Time to Triage | 2 days |
| Time to Resolution | depends on severity and complexity of the vulnerability |
You will receive updates throughout the resolution process.
Our Process
- Submission: Researchers submit reports via HackerOne, providing:
- Detailed reproduction steps
- Proof-of-concept code or screenshots, where applicable
- Validation: Autodesk’s Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) or HackerOne will validate and assess the vulnerability.
- Tracking: If multiple systems are impacted, include all affected systems in the report.
- Recognition: Duplicate reports will be marked accordingly, but the first valid submission will receive recognition.
Program Rules
To ensure efficient and ethical testing, researchers must adhere to the following rules:
- Employees of Autodesk and their immediate family members are not eligible to participate.
- Social engineering tactics (e.g. phishing, vishing, smishing) are strictly prohibited.
- Avoid privacy violations, destruction of data, or service interruption or degradation. Only test with accounts you own or have legal authorization to use and in compliance with the Autodesk Terms of Use.
- Do not use high volume scanners or automated testing tools, as these may be flagged as malicious and result in suspension of your account or banning your IP address.
- Do not publicly disclose vulnerabilities identified in the Autodesk VDP program until Autodesk has remediated the vulnerability and validated that the remediation was successful.
- Ensure your testing does not negatively impact other users or systems.
User Data Handling
- Do not access data beyond what is necessary to demonstrate the vulnerability. Whenever possible, please use methods that demonstrate vulnerabilities without exposing personal data.
- In the course of testing or reporting, researchers may encounter limited user data such as usernames, profile images, or email addresses. If you encounter this or other user data, report the issue to help us assess the impact. In some situations, user data may be visible to other users based on our services' design (for example, see the "Is the personal data you give us ever displayed publicly?" section of Autodesk's Privacy Statement and "Your Content" section of our Terms of Use) and as such, may not qualify for researcher rewards.
Priority
We prioritize vulnerabilities based on their severity, impact, and exploitability. Specifically, we focus on:
- Critical and high-severity vulnerabilities that impact confidentiality, integrity or availability of offerings or data stored in them.
- Common security risks, including:
- Remote Code Execution
- SQL Injection
- Buffer Overflows
- Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in sensitive contexts
- Authentication Bypasses
- OWASP Top 10 Vulnerabilities
- Lower-severity vulnerabilities, while appreciated, may receive lower prioritization.
Scope
Autodesk welcomes report of vulnerabilities affecting any Autodesk-owned system, application, or service. This includes but is not limited to:
- Web applications
- Desktop and mobile applications
- API and cloud services
All public-facing assets directly owned by Autodesk are open for testing under this policy. However, some assets are considered out-of-scope, including:
- Third-party sites that reference Autodesk branding but are not owned or operated by Autodesk (e.g., partner or reseller websites). Vulnerabilities in such third-party sites should be reported to the respective third-party.
- Versions of desktop applications that are either not officially supported or do not have the latest patch versions installed. For information about deprecated versions, please visit Autodesk available product versions. Patches are delivered through Autodesk Access or available for download on the Autodesk Accounts Portal.
- Some assets are considered out-of-scope for this program due to their association with third-party services, staging environments, or non-production endpoints. Please refer to the Out-of-Scope Asset List for the most current set of URLs, APIs and domains that should not be targeted. This list may be updated independently of this policy.
Important: Please do not target any of the assets listed in the Out-of-Scope Asset List as part of your security testing activities.
Program Exclusions
The following reports or activities will not be accepted:
- Denial of service attacks (including DoS, DDoS).
- Spamming or flooding systems with automated requests.
- Physical attack against Autodesk properties, data centers, or facilities.
- Reports from web crawlers or archivers such as URLs in Wayback Machine.
Eligibility
To ensure effective collaboration, researchers must:
- Notify us promptly upon discovering a potential vulnerability to allow timely resolution.
- Provide us a reasonable amount of time to resolve the issue before any disclosure to the public or third-party.
- Follow Autodesk’s and HackerOne's disclosure guidelines when reporting vulnerabilities.
- Submit detailed, reproducible reports, including proof-of-concept if applicable.
- Limit reports to one vulnerability unless multiple issues must be reported together to demonstrate impact.
- Proof-of-Concept (PoC) submissions must be designed to simulate impact without causing real damage. Malicious or destructive payloads are not permitted and will disqualify the submission.
Disclosure
Autodesk is committed to working with researchers to responsibly disclose reported vulnerabilities. For the protection of our customers, we request that researchers refrain from disclosing vulnerabilities until fixes are available and any potentially affected customers are notified.
Autodesk is a registered CNA (CVE Numbering Authority) and may issue a CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) if a vulnerability is confirmed to be in scope, meets Autodesk criteria, and is ready for public disclosure or release. This criteria includes, but is not limited to:
- The vulnerability is within scope of Autodesk products or services and does not belong to a third party or another registered CNA.
- The vulnerability is not publicly known or is not confidential.
- The vulnerability requires user interaction to patch or remediate.
All CVEs issued will be posted on the Autodesk Trust Center as part of a Security Advisory as well as published to the National Vulnerability Database (NVD). Autodesk will work with the researcher to ensure that their work is acknowledged as part of the advisory.
Rewards
Submissions to Autodesk’s VDP are not eligible for monetary rewards. However, researchers will receive acknowledgement for their contributions. Additionally, in select cases, swag items may be provided as a token of appreciation for outstanding efforts. Researchers also gain reputation points within the HackerOne platform for valid submissions.
Gold Standard Safe Harbor
Autodesk supports the protection of organizations and hackers engaged in Good Faith Security Research. “Good Faith Security Research” is accessing a computer solely for purposes of good-faith testing, investigation, and/or correction of a security flaw or vulnerability, where such activity is carried out in a manner designed to avoid any harm to individuals or the public, and where the information derived from the activity is used primarily to promote the security or safety of the class of devices, machines, or online services to which the accessed computer belongs or those who use such devices, machines, or online services. We consider Good Faith Security Research to be authorized activity that is protected from adversarial legal action by us. We waive any relevant restriction in our Terms of Use(“TOU”) and/or Acceptable Use Policies (“AUP”) that conflicts with the standard for Good Faith Security Research outlined here. This means that for Good Faith Security Research conducted with a good faith effort to comply with our program policy and while this program is active, we: Will not bring legal action against you or report you, including for bypassing technological measures we use to protect the applications in scope; and, Will take steps to make known that you conducted Good Faith Security Research if someone else brings legal action against you. You should contact us for clarification before engaging in conduct that you think may be inconsistent with Good Faith Security Research or unaddressed by our policy. Keep in mind that we are not able to authorize security research on third-party infrastructure, and a third party is not bound by this safe harbor statement.
Thank you for helping keep Autodesk and our users safe!