Divar
Bug bounty on security.txt divar.ir
- Top reward
- $5,500
- Top severity paid
- Critical
- Assets in scope
- 19
- Public CVEs
- 0
- Last change
- No changes yet
At a glance
What to know before you start testing.
- Pays up to $5,500
- for critical bugs, from $125.
- Report by email
- [email protected]
- Full safe harbor
- Good-faith research is authorised; no legal action.
- Publish after a fix
- Coordinate the timing with the company.
Rewards
What the company's own policy page says it pays.
| Severity | Relative size | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| Critical |
|
$5,500 |
| High |
|
$1,750 |
| Medium |
|
$500 |
- Top reward
-
$5,500
Critical Up to 5,500$
- Lowest reward
-
$125
Medium Vulnerability Severity 500$ 250$ 125$
- Safe harbor
-
Full
If you conduct your research in good faith and within the framework of this program, Divar considers your activity authorized and will not take legal or judicial action against you.
Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Scope
19 assets you may test, 4 excluded.
Domains 10
- agahpardazan.ir
- api.divar.ir
- divar.cloud
- divar.dev
- divar.io
- divar.ir
- git.divar.cloud
- grpc-api.divar.ir
- mail.divar.ir
- registry.divar.cloud
Wildcard domains 6
- agahpardazan.ir.*
- api.*.divar.cloud
- divar.cloud.*
- divar.dev.*
- divar.io.*
- m.divar.ir.*
Android apps 1
- Divar Mobile App - Android Version
iOS apps 1
- Divar Mobile App - iOS Version
Products and areas 1
- Business Panels
Out of scope (4)
- divar.news
- git.divar.cloud
- registry.divar.cloud
- api.*.divar.cloud
Rules
What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Divar's policy.
While testing
-
You only test the assets listed in the "Scope" section.
-
You follow the rules in the "Protecting Users While Testing" section.
-
You report the vulnerability immediately after discovering it and do not abuse it.
-
You do not share any details with anyone until the vulnerability is fixed and a coordinated disclosure is agreed upon.
-
Only use accounts that belong to you, or a test account created with prior coordination.
-
Stop testing as soon as you come across the first piece of real user data, and report the issue.
-
Do not download, retain, publish, or hand over user data to anyone else.
-
Do not modify or delete any data, and do not establish persistence.
-
Delete any user data you obtained during testing once you have submitted your report.
-
Do not degrade the quality of the service; denial-of-service attacks, bulk messaging, and spamming real users are not allowed.
Not accepted
-
CSRF Injections
-
Internal Open Redirect Vulnerabilities
-
Social Engineering and Phishing Attacks, Physical Attacks, Spamming
-
DoS and DDoS Attacks
-
Brute Forcing Accounts
-
Homographs or Similar Attacks
-
Failure to Apply Security Considerations on Cookies
-
Lack of or Weak Captcha
-
Clickjacking with No Sensitive Actions
-
Failure to Follow Security Best Practices Without Exploit
-
Vulnerabilities Requiring Highly Specific User Interaction
-
Vulnerabilities Related to Outdated Browsers
-
Self XSS
-
Third-party Software and Systems, If Access and Bug Patchability Are Not Possible, Are Considered Out of Scope
-
Vulnerabilities Reported by Scanners and Other Automated Tools Without Exploit
-
Reports of Low Versions of Libraries and Software Used Without Exploit
-
Vulnerabilities Related to Server Information Leaks and Incorrect Configurations Without Exploit
-
Vulnerabilities Related to Rate Limit and User Enumeration, Unless Leading to a Higher Severity
-
Reflected File Download
-
Clickjacking
-
Failure to Implement Security Headers
Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Changes
Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 3 hours ago.
No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.
Public CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.
No CVEs matched yet. We match NVD records by vendor name, so products sold under another name can be missing.