Skip to content

DokuWiki

Bug bounty on Sorona dokuwiki.org

Accepting reports open-source
Top reward
$1,500
Top severity paid
Critical
Assets in scope
11
Public CVEs
25
Last change
No changes yet

At a glance

What to know before you start testing.

Pays from $1,500
for critical bugs.
Partial safe harbor
Some legal protection; read the terms.
Publish after a fix
Coordinate the timing with the company.

Rewards

What Sorona lists as the payout for each severity.

Severity Reward
Critical $1,500+
High $700+
Medium $300+
Low $100 $100 / 1 month Claude Max
Safe harbor
Partial Sorona will not pursue legal action against you for good-faith research submitted to us in line with this policy. We cannot speak for the upstream project, its vendor, or any third party, and we do not grant authorization on their behalf.

Summarised with AI from the program policy on Sorona, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original

Scope

11 assets you may test, 7 excluded.

Web 1

  • https://www.dokuwiki.org

Products and areas 10

  • The ACL engine and the rules file it evaluates, which decides read, edit, create, upload and delete rights per namespace and per user or group
  • The authentication plugin interface and the bundled backends, covering plain-file accounts, LDAP, Active Directory and the SQL backends
  • The configuration manager and the installer, both of which write files that change how the wiki authenticates and authorises
  • The media manager: upload handling, MIME and extension checking, storage layout and the routes that serve uploaded files back to a browser
  • The page storage layer and the path handling that maps a page identifier to a file on disk, including the attic and meta directories
  • The parser and renderer, covering the syntax layer, the instruction cache and the settings that allow raw HTML or PHP in page content
  • The plugin and template manager, which downloads archives over the network and unpacks them into the installation
  • The project publishes a list of what does not qualify rather than a positive scope statement, and asks for everything else by email to the maintainer. Anything in the DokuWiki tree that the non-qualifying list does not cover is inside that
  • The search index and its incremental update path, where results can cross content the searcher cannot read
  • The XML-RPC and JSON-RPC remote API, and the permission checks it applies compared with the web interface
Out of scope (7)
  • AI-assisted findings submitted without the manual verification AI_POLICY.md requires
  • Denial of service and performance issues, ruled out by name in the project's non-qualifying list
  • Installation and deployment misconfiguration, including a data directory left inside the web root by the operator
  • Server-side request forgery, which the project excludes on the stated grounds that intranet access is a deployment feature
  • The behaviour of external software the wiki interacts with rather than a defect in DokuWiki itself
  • Third-party plugins and templates from the plugin repository, which are separate projects with their own authors
  • Upstream PHP and library defects, unless DokuWiki's own use of them is what makes the issue reachable

Rules

What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Sorona's policy.

While testing

  • Submit through sorona.xyz.
  • Email the maintainer at the address on the policy page .
  • Read the non-qualifying list before you start.
  • AI_POLICY.md requires that AI-assisted findings be manually verified before they are submitted
  • Test against a current release.
  • Use the canonical repository dokuwiki/dokuwiki .
  • Hold the detail until a patched release is out.

Not accepted

  • Denial of service and performance issues
  • Server-side request forgery
  • The behaviour of external software the wiki interacts with rather than a defect in DokuWiki itself
  • Installation and deployment misconfiguration, including a data directory left inside the web root by the operator
  • Third-party plugins and templates from the plugin repository
  • Upstream PHP and library defects, unless DokuWiki's own use of them is what makes the issue reachable
  • AI-assisted findings submitted without the manual verification AI_POLICY.md requires

Summarised with AI from the program policy on Sorona, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original

Changes

Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 1 hour ago.

No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.

Public CVEs

Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.

Search NVD
CVESeverityPublished
CVE-2026-26477 Medium 4.3 3 Apr 2026
CVE-2019-25338 Medium 6.9 12 Feb 2026
CVE-2023-34408 Medium 5.4 5 Jun 2023
CVE-2022-3123 Medium 6.1 5 Sep 2022
CVE-2022-28919 Medium 6.1 12 May 2022
CVE-2018-15474 Critical 9.6 7 Sep 2018
CVE-2017-18123 High 8.6 3 Feb 2018
CVE-2017-12979 Medium 6.1 21 Aug 2017
CVE-2017-12980 Medium 6.1 21 Aug 2017
CVE-2017-12583 Medium 6.1 6 Aug 2017
CVE-2016-7965 Medium 6.5 31 Oct 2016
CVE-2016-7964 High 8.6 31 Oct 2016
CVE-2015-2172 Medium 6.5 30 Mar 2015
CVE-2014-9253 Medium 4.3 17 Dec 2014
CVE-2014-8761 Medium 5.0 22 Oct 2014
CVE-2014-8762 Medium 5.0 22 Oct 2014
CVE-2014-8763 Medium 5.0 22 Oct 2014
CVE-2014-8764 Medium 5.0 22 Oct 2014
CVE-2012-3354 Medium 4.3 20 Nov 2012
CVE-2011-3727 Medium 5.0 23 Sep 2011
CVE-2011-2510 Medium 4.3 14 Jul 2011
CVE-2010-0287 Medium 5.0 15 Feb 2010
CVE-2010-0288 High 7.5 15 Feb 2010
CVE-2010-0289 Medium 6.8 15 Feb 2010
CVE-2009-1960 High 9.3 8 Jun 2009

Original policy

Copied from sorona.xyz on 12 Nov 2026. The summaries on this page are made from it; the live page may have changed since.

Skip to content What this pays This project runs no bounty of its own. sorona.xyz pays you directly on qualified, reproduced findings. Severity │ sorona.xyz pays Critical │ $1,500+ High │ $700+ Medium │ $300+ Low │ $100 / 1 month Claude Max Submit a vulnerability Latest advisories Loading the feed Overview DokuWiki is a flat-file PHP wiki with no database behind it, so it lands on network appliances and inside corporate intranets that would rather not run MySQL for a documentation tool. W3Techs puts it at 22.5% of every wiki engine in use, second only to MediaWiki, and the linuxserver image alone carries 24 million pulls. The security model is the ACL file plus the media manager: page content and uploads both go straight to disk in a tree the web server is already serving. Nobody has ever published a GitHub advisory for it, and reports go to one maintainer by email for nothing, so sorona.xyz pays you directly on qualified, reproduced findings. In scope The project publishes a list of what does not qualify rather than a positive scope statement, and asks for everything else by email to the maintainer. Anything in the DokuWiki tree that the non-qualifying list does not cover is inside that The ACL engine and the rules file it evaluates, which decides read, edit, create, upload and delete rights per namespace and per user or group The authentication plugin interface and the bundled backends, covering plain-file accounts, LDAP, Active Directory and the SQL backends The media manager: upload handling, MIME and extension checking, storage layout and the routes that serve uploaded files back to a browser The page storage layer and the path handling that maps a page identifier to a file on disk, including the attic and meta directories The parser and renderer, covering the syntax layer, the instruction cache and the settings that allow raw HTML or PHP in page content The plugin and template manager, which downloads archives over the network and unpacks them into the installation The XML-RPC and JSON-RPC remote API, and the permission checks it applies compared with the web interface The configuration manager and the installer, both of which write files that change how the wiki authenticates and authorises The search index and its incremental update path, where results can cross content the searcher cannot read Out of scope Denial of service and performance issues, ruled out by name in the project's non-qualifying list Server-side request forgery, which the project excludes on the stated grounds that intranet access is a deployment feature The behaviour of external software the wiki interacts with rather than a defect in DokuWiki itself Installation and deployment misconfiguration, including a data directory left inside the web root by the operator Third-party plugins and templates from the plugin repository, which are separate projects with their own authors Upstream PHP and library defects, unless DokuWiki's own use of them is what makes the issue reachable AI-assisted findings submitted without the manual verification AI_POLICY.md requires Most-valued findings There is no CVE or advisory record to prioritise from, since the project has never used the GitHub advisory channel. Priorities below follow the trust boundaries the product actually has ACL bypass: reading, editing or uploading into a namespace the rules file gated. On an intranet wiki the restricted namespace is usually the reason the wiki was deployed Path traversal in the mapping from a page or media identifier to a file on disk, where a crafted identifier reads or writes outside the data tree Upload handling that puts a file somewhere the web server will execute, or that defeats the MIME and extension checks the media manager applies Stored cross-site scripting through the parser and renderer, including anywhere a syntax construct emits markup that escaped the sanitisation step The plugin and template manager, where a fetched or unpacked archive becomes code execution on the host Authentication backend defects, particularly an LDAP or SQL bind that accepts an identity or a password it should reject Anything unauthenticated, on an install base that overwhelmingly assumes a network boundary is doing the access control for it Program rules Submit through sorona.xyz. This project runs no bounty of its own; we validate, coordinate disclosure with the maintainers, and pay you directly. Email the maintainer at [email protected] . The policy also lists a GitHub issue and the mailing list, both of which are public, so email is the only private route Read the non-qualifying list before you start. Denial of service and performance issues, server-side request forgery, the behaviour of external software and installation misconfiguration are all ruled out by name Server-side request forgery specifically is closed by policy rather than by triage: the project states that reaching intranet resources is a feature for many deployments AI_POLICY.md requires that AI-assisted findings be manually verified before they are submitted Test against a current release. release-2026-07-14a shipped in July 2026 and the project ships on a steady cadence Use the canonical repository dokuwiki/dokuwiki . The old splitbrain/dokuwiki path redirects to it Disclosure Coordinated by email with the one maintainer who has run the project for two decades. Fixes ship in dated releases and the project publishes no GitHub advisories at all, so there is no GHSA to time an embargo against and no fixed day count to plan for. Hold the detail until a patched release is out. Safe harbor Sorona will not pursue legal action against you for good-faith research submitted to us in line with this policy. We cannot speak for the upstream project, its vendor, or any third party, and we do not grant authorization on their behalf. You are responsible for understanding and following the laws that apply to you, wherever you are, and for staying within any scope the project has defined. Submit a vulnerability