Skip to content

Klei Entertainment

Bug bounty on security.txt klei.com

Accepting reports Full safe harbor security.txt
Top reward
Not published
Top severity paid
Not published
Assets in scope
2
Public CVEs
0
Last change
No changes yet

At a glance

What to know before you start testing.

Pays cash
Amounts are not published; ask before you invest time.
Report by email
[email protected]
Full safe harbor
Good-faith research is authorised; no legal action.
Publish after a fix
Coordinate the timing with the company.

Rewards

What the company's own policy page says it pays.

The policy page has no reward table. Here is what it says, in its own words.

Pays cash
Yes Rewards are available for qualifying vulnerability reports but be aware that our standards are very high and reports that did not follow these rules will be ignored.
Safe harbor
Full Any activities conducted in a manner consistent with this policy will be considered authorized conduct and we will not initiate legal action against you.

Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original

Scope

2 assets you may test, 18 excluded.

Domains 2

  • klei.com
  • kleientertainment.com
Out of scope (18)
  • Any activity that could lead to the disruption of our service (DoS).
  • Attacks requiring MITM or physical access to a user's device.
  • Attacks requiring the use of mods in one of our games
  • Clickjacking on pages with no sensitive actions
  • Content spoofing and text injection issues without showing an attack vector/without being able to modify HTML/CSS
  • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on unauthenticated forms or forms with no sensitive actions
  • Issues that require unlikely user interaction
  • Missing best practices in Content Security Policy.
  • Missing best practices in SSL/TLS configuration.
  • Missing email best practices (Invalid, incomplete or missing SPF/DKIM/DMARC records, etc.)
  • Open redirect - unless an additional security impact can be demonstrated
  • Previously known vulnerable libraries without a working Proof of Concept.
  • Public Zero-day vulnerabilities that have had an official patch for less than 1 month will be awarded on a case by case basis.
  • Rate limiting or bruteforce issues on non-authentication endpoints
  • Software version disclosure / Banner identification issues / Descriptive error messages or headers (e.g. stack traces, application or server errors).
  • Tabnabbing
  • Vulnerabilities in the games themselves (rather than the backend services for these games)
  • Vulnerabilities only affecting users of outdated or unpatched browsers [Less than 2 stable versions behind the latest released stable version]

Rules

What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Klei Entertainment's policy. "We" in these lines means the program, not this site.

While testing

  • Please provide detailed reports with reproducible steps.
  • Submit one vulnerability per report, unless you need to chain vulnerabilities to provide impact.
  • When duplicates occur, we only award the first report that was received (provided that it can be fully reproduced).
  • Multiple vulnerabilities caused by one underlying issue will be awarded one bounty.
  • Social engineering (e.g. phishing, vishing, smishing) is prohibited.
  • Make a good faith effort to avoid privacy violations, destruction of data, and interruption or degradation of our service.
  • Only interact with accounts you own or with explicit permission of the account holder.
  • Please be polite and respectful in your exploration, no DoS attacks or the like.

Not accepted

  • Vulnerabilities in the games themselves (rather than the backend services for these games)
  • Attacks requiring the use of mods in one of our games
  • Clickjacking on pages with no sensitive actions
  • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on unauthenticated forms or forms with no sensitive actions
  • Attacks requiring MITM or physical access to a user's device.
  • Previously known vulnerable libraries without a working Proof of Concept.
  • Missing best practices in SSL/TLS configuration.
  • Any activity that could lead to the disruption of our service (DoS).
  • Content spoofing and text injection issues without showing an attack vector/without being able to modify HTML/CSS
  • Rate limiting or bruteforce issues on non-authentication endpoints
  • Missing best practices in Content Security Policy.
  • Missing email best practices (Invalid, incomplete or missing SPF/DKIM/DMARC records, etc.)
  • Vulnerabilities only affecting users of outdated or unpatched browsers [Less than 2 stable versions behind the latest released stable version]
  • Software version disclosure / Banner identification issues / Descriptive error messages or headers (e.g. stack traces, application or server errors).
  • Tabnabbing
  • Open redirect - unless an additional security impact can be demonstrated
  • Issues that require unlikely user interaction

Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original

Changes

Tracked since 12 Nov 2026. Last checked 3 hours ago.

No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.

Public CVEs

Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.

Search NVD

No CVEs matched yet. We match NVD records by vendor name, so products sold under another name can be missing.