- Top reward
- $6,000
- Top severity paid
- Critical
- Assets in scope
- 3
- Public CVEs
- 60
- Last change
At a glance
What to know before you start testing.
- Pays up to $6,000
- for critical bugs, from $200.
- Report on Bugcrowd
- Submit through the program page.
- Full safe harbor
- Good-faith research is authorised; no legal action.
- Publish after a fix
- Coordinate the timing with the company.
Rewards
What Bugcrowd lists as the payout for each severity.
| Severity | Relative size | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| Critical |
|
$6,000 |
| High |
|
$3,000 from $2,000 |
| Medium |
|
$1,000 from $500 |
| Low |
|
$300 from $200 |
- Safe harbor
-
Full
Authorised in accordance with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) (and similar state laws), and we will not initiate or support legal action against you for accidental, good-faith violations of this policy.
Summarised with AI from the program policy on Bugcrowd, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Earlier reward tables (1)
- 11 Nov 2026 to 11 Nov 2026: Critical up to $6,000
Scope
3 assets you may test, 12 excluded.
Web 1
- https://octopus.com
Wildcard domains 1
- *.octopus.com
Products and areas 1
- https://github.com/OctopusDeploy
Out of scope (12)
- i.octopus.com
- ir.octopus.com
- artifactorysample.octopus.com
- bamboosample.octopus.com
- jenkinssample.octopus.com
- myget.octopus.com
- nexussample.octopus.com
- partners.octopus.com
- shop.octopus.com
- teamcitysample.octopus.com
- trust.octopus.com
- *.octopus.app
Rules
What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Octopus (via Bugcrowd)'s policy. "We" in these lines means the program, not this site.
While testing
-
Ensure that you use your @bugcrowdninja.com email address when you’re testing our assets, any use of other email addresses may be treated as malicious and blocked.
-
When testing, please use the least invasive test possible (e.g. calling a 1x1 image or a nonexistent page on your web server).
-
The use of automated scanners is prohibited.
-
You must ensure that your testing does not affect customer data in any way. Please ensure that you're being non-destructive while testing.
-
In addition to the above, customer instances are not to be accessed in any way (i.e., no customer data is to be accessed, and customer credentials are not to be used or "verified").
-
Please do not use social engineering, phishing, or unauthorised access to infrastructure.
-
Please do not test the physical security of Octopus Deploy offices, employees, equipment, etc.
-
Reports must be submitted in plain text (associated pictures/videos are fine as long as they're in standard formats).
-
Before publicly disclosing an issue, we require that you first request permission from us.
-
No load testing (DoS/DDoS, etc) is allowed on the test websites.
Not accepted
-
Subdomain takeover.
-
WAF Bypasses (Octopus is currently reworking their WAF and not accepting any bypasses at this time).
-
Secrets such as API keys or passwords obtained from external aggregation/indexed data sources (e.g. dehashed.com and intelx.io).
-
Descriptive error messages (e.g. Stack Traces, application, and server errors).
-
Fingerprinting/banner disclosure on common/public services.
-
Disclosure of known public files or directories (e.g. robots.txt).
-
Clickjacking and issues only exploitable through clickjacking.
-
CSRF attacks that require knowledge of the CSRF token (e.g. attacks involving a local machine).
-
Logout Cross-Site Request Forgery.
-
Content spoofing.
-
The presence of an application or web browser with "autocomplete" or "save password" functionality.
-
Lack of Secure/HTTPOnly flags on non-sensitive Cookies.
-
Lack of Security Speed Bump when leaving the site.
-
Log in or Forgot Password page brute force and account lockout not enforced.
-
Missing HTTP security headers
-
SSL/TLS Issues.
-
No load testing (DoS/DDoS, etc) is allowed on the test websites.
-
Self-XSS reports will not be accepted.
-
Any XSS requiring local access (e.g., User-Agent Header injection) will not be accepted.
-
Vulnerabilities limited to old browsers will not be accepted (e.g. "this exploit only works in IE6/IE7").
-
Known vulnerabilities in used libraries (e.g. jQuery) unless you can prove exploitability.
-
Missing or incorrect SPF records of any kind.
-
Missing or incorrect DMARC records of any kind.
-
Any source code disclosure.
-
Information disclosure of non-confidential information (e.g. issue ID, project ID).
Summarised with AI from the program policy on Bugcrowd, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Changes
Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 27 minutes ago.
No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.
Before we tracked it
Scope and reward changes recorded before this page started tracking it.
-
Status
Program status changed
-
Status
Program status changed
-
Scope added
shop.octopus.com (out of scope)
-
Rules updated
+ shop.octopus.com
Public CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.
| CVE | Summary | Severity | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-12878 | In affected versions of the Codefresh platform an authenticated user can utilize an API endpoint to elevate to Admin permissions. | High 8.6 | 25 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-14163 | In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain circumstances it is possible for sensitive variables to be printed in the deployment variable snapshot in clear-text. | High 7.1 | 20 Aug 2026 |
| CVE-2026-12702 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy Insufficient checks on the project trigger actions allows an unauthorized user to trigger a deployment. | Medium 5.1 | 24 Jul 2026 |
| CVE-2026-4881 | In affected versions of Octopus Server, permissions were not checked correctly resulting in any authenticated user being able to make server level changes using a certain API endpoint despite receiving an error. | Medium 6.0 | 4 Jun 2026 |
| CVE-2026-3237 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible for a low privileged user to manipulate an API request to change the signing key expiration and revocation time frames via an API endpoint that had incorrect permission validation. It was not possible to expose the signing keys using this vulnerability. | Low 2.3 | 17 Mar 2026 |
| CVE-2026-3236 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible to create a new API key from an existing access token resulting in the new API key having a lifetime exceeding the original API key used to mint the access token. | Low 2.3 | 5 Mar 2026 |
| CVE-2026-0704 | In affected version of Octopus Deploy it was possible to remove files and/or contents of files on the host using an API endpoint. The field lacked validation which could potentially result in ways to circumvent expected workflows. | Medium 5.9 | 25 Feb 2026 |
| CVE-2025-0539 | In affected Microsoft Windows versions of Octopus Deploy, the server can be coerced into sending server-side requests that contain authentication material allowing a suitably positioned attacker to compromise the account running Octopus Server and potentially the host infrastructure itself. | Medium 5.9 | 10 Apr 2025 |
| CVE-2025-0588 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible for a user with sufficient access to set custom headers in all server responses. By submitting a specifically crafted referrer header the user could ensure that all subsequent server responses would return 500 errors rendering the site mostly unusable. The user would be able to subsequently set and unset the referrer header to control the deni | Medium 5.9 | 11 Feb 2025 |
| CVE-2025-0526 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it was possible to upload files to unexpected locations on the host using an API endpoint. The field lacked validation which could potentially result in ways to circumvent expected workflows. | Low 2.3 | 11 Feb 2025 |
| CVE-2025-0513 | In affected versions of Octopus Server error messages were handled unsafely on the error page. If an adversary could control any part of the error message they could embed code which may impact the user viewing the error message. | Low 1.8 | 11 Feb 2025 |
| CVE-2025-0525 | In affected versions of Octopus Server the preview import feature could be leveraged to identify the existence of a target file. This could provide an adversary with information that may aid in further attacks against the server. | Low 2.3 | 11 Feb 2025 |
| CVE-2025-0589 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy where customers are using Active Directory for authentication it was possible for an unauthenticated user to make an API request against two endpoints which would retrieve some data from the associated Active Directory. The requests when crafted correctly would return specific information from user profiles (Email address/UPN and Display name) from one endpoi | Medium 6.9 | 11 Feb 2025 |
| CVE-2024-9194 | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Linux and Microsoft Windows Octopus Server on Windows, Linux allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Octopus Server: from 2024.1.0 before 2024.1.13038, from 2024.2.0 before 2024.2.9482, from 2024.3.0 before 2024.3.12766. | High 8.7 | 30 Sep 2024 |
| CVE-2024-1656 | Affected versions of Octopus Server had a weak content security policy. | Low 2.6 | 11 Sep 2024 |
| CVE-2024-7998 | In affected versions of Octopus Server OIDC cookies were using the wrong expiration time which could result in them using the maximum lifespan. | Low 2.6 | 21 Aug 2024 |
| CVE-2024-6972 | In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain circumstances it is possible for sensitive variables to be printed in the task log in clear-text. | Medium 6.5 | 25 Jul 2024 |
| CVE-2024-4811 | In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain conditions, a user with specific role assignments can access restricted project artifacts. | Low 2.2 | 25 Jul 2024 |
| CVE-2024-4456 | In affected versions of Octopus Server with certain access levels it was possible to embed a Cross-Site Scripting payload on the audit page. | Medium 4.1 | 8 May 2024 |
| CVE-2024-4226 | It was identified that in certain versions of Octopus Server, that a user created with no permissions could view all users, user roles and permissions. This functionality was removed in versions of Octopus Server after the fixed versions listed. | Low 3.5 | 30 Apr 2024 |
| CVE-2023-4509 | It is possible for an API key to be logged in clear text in the audit log file after an invalid login attempt. | Medium 4.3 | 18 Apr 2024 |
| CVE-2024-2975 | A race condition was identified through which privilege escalation was possible in certain configurations. | High 8.8 | 9 Apr 2024 |
| CVE-2023-1904 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for the OpenID client secret to be logged in clear text during the configuration of Octopus Server. | Medium 4.2 | 14 Dec 2023 |
| CVE-2022-2416 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to craft a request that allows enumeration/recon of an environment. | Medium 5.5 | 2 Aug 2023 |
| CVE-2022-2346 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to interact with extension endpoints. | Medium 5.5 | 2 Aug 2023 |
| CVE-2022-4870 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to discover network details via error message | Medium 5.3 | 18 May 2023 |
| CVE-2022-4008 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a zipbomb file as a task which results in Denial of Service | Medium 5.5 | 10 May 2023 |
| CVE-2023-2247 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to unmask variable secrets using the variable preview function | Medium 5.3 | 2 May 2023 |
| CVE-2022-2507 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to render user supplied input into the webpage | Medium 5.3 | 19 Apr 2023 |
| CVE-2022-4009 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to introduce code via offline package creation | High 8.8 | 16 Mar 2023 |
| CVE-2022-2259 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Workerpools without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items | Medium 4.3 | 13 Mar 2023 |
| CVE-2022-2258 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Tagsets without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items | Medium 4.3 | 13 Mar 2023 |
| CVE-2022-2883 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a zipbomb file as a task which results in Denial of Service | High 7.5 | 22 Feb 2023 |
| CVE-2022-4898 | In affected versions of Octopus Server the help sidebar can be customized to include a Cross-Site Scripting payload in the support link. This was initially resolved in advisory 2022-07 however it was identified that the fix could be bypassed in certain circumstances. A different approach was taken to prevent the possibility of the support link being susceptible to XSS | Medium 5.4 | 31 Jan 2023 |
| CVE-2022-3614 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy users of certain browsers using AD to sign-in to Octopus Server were able to bypass authentication checks and be redirected to the configured redirect url without any validation. | Medium 6.1 | 3 Jan 2023 |
| CVE-2022-3460 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for certain types of sensitive variables to inadvertently become unmasked when viewed in variable preview. | High 7.5 | 3 Jan 2023 |
| CVE-2022-2721 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for target discovery to print certain values marked as sensitive to log files in plaint-text in when verbose logging is enabled. | High 7.5 | 25 Nov 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2572 | In affected versions of Octopus Server where access is managed by an external authentication provider, it was possible that the API key/keys of a disabled/deleted user were still valid after the access was revoked. | Critical 9.8 | 1 Nov 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2508 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to reveal the existence of resources in a space that the user does not have access to due to verbose error messaging. | Medium 5.3 | 27 Oct 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2782 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for a session token to be valid indefinitely due to improper validation of the session token parameters. | Critical 9.1 | 27 Oct 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2780 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to use the Git Connectivity test function on the VCS project to initiate an SMB request resulting in the potential for an NTLM relay attack. | High 8.1 | 14 Oct 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2828 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to reveal information about teams via the API due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability | Medium 6.5 | 13 Oct 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2720 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that when a sensitive value is a substring of another value, sensitive value masking will only partially work. | Medium 5.3 | 12 Oct 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2783 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that a session cookie could be used as the CSRF token | Medium 5.3 | 6 Oct 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2781 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it was identified that the same encryption process was used for both encrypting session cookies and variables. | Medium 5.3 | 6 Oct 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2778 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to bypass rate limiting on login using null bytes. | Critical 9.8 | 30 Sep 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2760 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to reveal the Space ID of spaces that the user does not have access to view in an error message when a resource is part of another Space. | Medium 4.3 | 28 Sep 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2528 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a package to built-in feed with insufficient permissions after re-indexing packages. | Medium 6.5 | 9 Sep 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2075 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service targeting the build information request validation. | High 7.5 | 19 Aug 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2074 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service using the Variable Project Template. | High 7.5 | 19 Aug 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2049 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service via the package upload function. | High 7.5 | 19 Aug 2022 |
| CVE-2022-1901 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to unmask sensitive variables by using variable preview. | Medium 5.3 | 19 Aug 2022 |
| CVE-2022-30532 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy, there is no logging of changes to artifacts within Octopus Deploy. | Medium 5.3 | 19 Jul 2022 |
| CVE-2022-29890 | In affected versions of Octopus Server the help sidebar can be customized to include a Cross-Site Scripting payload in the support link. | Medium 6.1 | 15 Jul 2022 |
| CVE-2022-1881 | In affected versions of Octopus Server an Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability exists where it is possible for a user to download Project Exports from a Project they do not have permissions to access. This vulnerability only impacts projects within the same Space. | Medium 5.3 | 15 Jul 2022 |
| CVE-2022-2013 | In Octopus Server after version 2022.1.1495 and before 2022.1.2647 if private spaces were enabled via the experimental feature flag all new users would have access to the Script Console within their private space. | High 7.5 | 13 Jun 2022 |
| CVE-2022-1670 | When generating a user invitation code in Octopus Server, the validity of this code can be set for a specific number of users. It was possible to bypass this restriction of validity to create extra user accounts above the initial number of invited users. | High 7.5 | 19 May 2022 |
| CVE-2022-1502 | Permissions were not properly verified in the API on projects using version control in Git. This allowed projects to be modified by users with only ProjectView permissions. | Medium 4.3 | 4 May 2022 |
| CVE-2022-23184 | In affected Octopus Server versions when the server HTTP and HTTPS bindings are configured to localhost, Octopus Server will allow open redirects. | Medium 6.1 | 7 Feb 2022 |
| CVE-2021-31821 | When the Windows Tentacle docker image starts up it logs all the commands that it runs along with the arguments, which writes the Octopus Server API key in plaintext. This does not affect the Linux Docker image | Medium 5.5 | 19 Jan 2022 |
Original policy
Copied from bugcrowd.com on 12 Nov 2026. The summaries on this page are made from it; the live page may have changed since.
Description
Octopus Deploy invites you to test and help secure our primary publicly facing assets - focusing first on our primary web application. We appreciate your efforts and hard work in making the internet (and Octopus Deploy) more secure, and look forward to working with the researcher community to create a meaningful and successful bug bounty program. Good luck and happy hunting! What you should know before you start Ensure that you use your @bugcrowdninja.com email address when you’re testing our assets, any use of other email addresses may be treated as malicious and blocked. Ensure that you understand the targets, scopes, exclusions, and rules below. Please feel free to reach out and ask questions to clarify. We want you to feel as confident as possible. Ratings / Rewards: For the initial prioritization/rating of findings, this program will use the Bugcrowd Vulnerability Rating Taxonomy . However, it is important to note that in some cases a vulnerability priority will be modified due to its likelihood or impact. In any instance where an issue is downgraded, a full, detailed explanation will be provided to the researcher - along with the opportunity to appeal, and make a case for a higher priority. Please see below for any deviations from the standard VRT. Employees, Contractors, Interns, and immediate family members are not eligible to receive rewards from our public-facing bug bounty programs. This restriction exists because employees may have access to internal systems, non-public information, or responsibilities that could create an actual, potential, or perceived conflict of interest. Employees who identify potential vulnerabilities must report them internally to the Security Operations team via [email protected].
Targets
Testing is only authorised on the targets listed as in-scope. Any domain/property of Octopus not listed in the targets section is out of scope. This includes any/all subdomains not listed above. Target Info Credentials: Please sign up for an account using your @bugcrowdninja.com email address. For more info regarding @bugcrowdninja email addresses, see here . When getting started, click the sign-in URL at https://octopus.com/register?registerReturnUrl=%2Fsignin and register there. Focus Areas Ultimately, we want to allow our customers to have a safe environment in which to manage their accounts, access our documentation, and manage their instances. Therefore, we're interested in traditional web application vulnerabilities, as well as other vulnerabilities that can have a direct impact on our customers. Below is a list of some of the vulnerability classes that we are seeking reports for: Server-side Remote Code Execution (RCE) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Stored/Reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) SQL Injection (SQLi) XML External Entity Attacks (XXE) Access Control Vulnerabilities (Insecure Direct Object Reference issues, etc) Path/Directory Traversal Issues Out of Scope and Other Exclusions To be as clear as possible, the following are also out of scope for testing : Subdomain takeover. WAF Bypasses (Octopus is currently reworking their WAF and not accepting any bypasses at this time). Secrets such as API keys or passwords obtained from external aggregation/indexed data sources (e.g. dehashed.com and intelx.io). Our self-hosted Octopus Deploy product, including its authentication and authorisation plugins. Our cloud-hosted Octopus Deploy product. Any of our closed or open-source tooling, build chain, public-facing repositories, email and IM servers, social media accounts, or third-party SaaS products that we use to deliver our services. Blind XSS must not return any user data you do not have access to (e.g., screenshots and cookies you don't own). When testing, please use the least invasive test possible (e.g. calling a 1x1 image or a nonexistent page on your web server). When testing, please exercise caution if injecting on any form that may be publicly visible, such as forums. Before injection, please ensure your payload can be removed from the site. If it cannot be easily removed, please check with support@bugcrowd before performing the testing. Pivoting and post-exploitation attacks are fine, particularly between test.octopus.com and test-account.octopus.com, so long as you aren’t attempting to destroy any infrastructure or data. Any internal or development services. The use of automated scanners is prohibited. Descriptive error messages (e.g. Stack Traces, application, and server errors). Fingerprinting/banner disclosure on common/public services. Disclosure of known public files or directories (e.g. robots.txt). Clickjacking and issues only exploitable through clickjacking. CSRF attacks that require knowledge of the CSRF token (e.g. attacks involving a local machine). Logout Cross-Site Request Forgery. Content spoofing. The presence of an application or web browser with "autocomplete" or "save password" functionality. Lack of Secure/HTTPOnly flags on non-sensitive Cookies. Lack of Security Speed Bump when leaving the site. Log in or Forgot Password page brute force and account lockout not enforced. Missing HTTP security headers, specifically (https://www.owasp.org/index.php/List_of_useful_HTTP_headers). For example: Strict-Transport-Security. X-Frame-Options. X-XSS-Protection. X-Content-Type-Options. Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Security-Policy, X-WebKit-CSP. Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only. Cache-Control and Pragma. SSL/TLS Issues. For example: SSL Attacks such as BEAST, BREACH, and Renegotiation attacks. SSL Forward secrecy not enabled. SSL weak/insecure cipher suites. No load testing (DoS/DDoS, etc) is allowed on the test websites. Self-XSS reports will not be accepted. Any XSS requiring local access (e.g., User-Agent Header injection) will not be accepted. The only exception is if you can show a working off-path MiTM attack that will allow the XSS to trigger. Vulnerabilities limited to old browsers will not be accepted (e.g. "this exploit only works in IE6/IE7"). Known vulnerabilities in used libraries (e.g. jQuery) unless you can prove exploitability. Missing or incorrect SPF records of any kind. Missing or incorrect DMARC records of any kind. Any source code disclosure. Information disclosure of non-confidential information (e.g. issue ID, project ID). Email bombing. Request flooding (e.g. pixel flooding(we consider this a DoS attempt)). Testing rate limits. Session cookies for https://account.octopus.com will be valid for up to 10 minutes after logging out. Please do not report on any session fixation/management vulnerabilities unless you can show an account takeover after 10 minutes. i.octopus.com contains a large number of files that are intended to be public. This includes but is not limited to files that are referenced Here (such as tax residency, W8-BEN-E form, bank attestation documents etc) on our trust resources page. If a document is identified that you believe does not fall into this category and should be bought to our attention - please make a submission and it will be reviewed. NPM name squatting is not considered a valid finding unless the package name is referenced as a dependancy by at least one octopus NPM package Testing is only authorised on the targets listed as in-scope. Any domain/property of Octopus not listed in the targets section is out of scope, including any/all subdomains not listed above. If you identify a security vulnerability on a not-in-scope target that demonstrably belongs to the Octopus organisation, you can report it to this program. However, while it is appreciated, it will ultimately be marked as "not applicable" and not eligible for monetary or points-based compensation. Other Rules You must ensure that your testing does not affect customer data in any way. Please ensure that you're being non-destructive while testing. In addition to the above, customer instances are not to be accessed in any way (i.e., no customer data is to be accessed, and customer credentials are not to be used or "verified"). If you believe you have found sensitive customer data (e.g., login credentials, API keys, etc.) or a way to access customer data (e.g., through a vulnerability), report it, but do not attempt to validate whether/that it works successfully. Use of any automated vulnerability scanners is prohibited. Reports must be submitted in plain text (associated pictures/videos are fine as long as they're in standard formats). Non-plain text reports (e.g. PDF and DOCX) will be asked to be resubmitted in plain text. Grants/awards are at Octopus Deploy's discretion, and we withhold the right to grant, modify, or deny grants. Please do not use social engineering, phishing, or unauthorised access to infrastructure. Please do not test the physical security of Octopus Deploy offices, employees, equipment, etc. This bounty follows Bugcrowd’s standard disclosure terms. Public Disclosure Before publicly disclosing an issue, we require that you first request permission from us. Octopus Deploy will process requests for public disclosure on a per-report basis. Requests to publicly disclose an issue that has not yet been fixed for customers will be rejected. Safe Harbor: When conducting vulnerability research according to this policy, we consider this research to be: Authorised in accordance with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) (and similar state laws), and we will not initiate or support legal action against you for accidental, good-faith violations of this policy. Exempt from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), and we will not bring a claim against you for circumvention of technology controls. Exempt from restrictions in our Terms & Conditions that would interfere with conducting security research, and we waive those restrictions on a limited basis for work done under this policy. Lawful and helpful to the overall security of the Internet and conducted in good faith. Expected to comply with all applicable laws. If you have concerns or are uncertain whether your security research is consistent with this policy, please inquire via [email protected] before going further.
In Scope (in scope)
Please note that dependencies with known issues within the GitHub are not considered valid without a working proof of concept that affects the actual platform. In addition, API keys on their own are not considered valid. In order to have a valid leaked API key, the domain URL must be referencing an Octopus domain that fits *.octopus.app. Any API keys with localhost or test within their name are considered invalid.
Out of scope targets (out of scope)
Targets in this list are OUT OF SCOPE. Please also review the brief information below for more details, it contains important information and also lists further areas that are considered out of scope for this bounty.