Porch Group
Vulnerability disclosure program on security.txt porch.com
- Top reward
- No cash rewards
- Top severity paid
- Not published
- Assets in scope
- 2
- Public CVEs
- 0
- Last change
- No changes yet
At a glance
What to know before you start testing.
- No cash rewards
- A disclosure program: you report for credit, not money.
- Report by email
- [email protected]
- Full safe harbor
- Good-faith research is authorised; no legal action.
- Replies within 14 days
- As the policy promises.
Rewards
What the company's own policy page says it pays.
This program does not pay cash rewards.
- Pays cash
-
No
At this time, Porch Group does not operate a formal bug bounty program with monetary rewards.
- Response
-
Within 14 days
Within 2 weeks
- Safe harbor
-
Full
Porch Group will not pursue civil or criminal action against researchers who make a good-faith effort to comply with this policy.
- Hall of fame
-
Yes
Researchers who report valid, in-scope vulnerabilities are credited publicly in our Hall of Fame (with their permission) upon resolution.
Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Scope
2 assets you may test.
Domains 1
- porch.com
Products and areas 1
- Porch Group or any of its subsidiaries
Rules
What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Porch Group's policy.
While testing
-
You must not access, modify, or delete data beyond what is minimally necessary to demonstrate the vulnerability.
-
Testing must be limited to accounts and data you own or have explicit permission to test.
Not accepted
-
Theoretical / Unlikely Attack Scenarios
-
Vulnerabilities only affecting users of unsupported or end-of-life browsers or operating systems
-
Broken link hijacking
-
Tabnabbing
-
Content spoofing and text injection issues
-
Attacks requiring physical access to a device
-
Self-exploitation: self-XSS, self-DoS (unless it can be used to attack another account)
-
Clickjacking on pages with no sensitive actions
-
CSRF on forms with no sensitive actions (e.g., logout)
-
Permissive CORS configurations without demonstrated security impact
-
Software version disclosure, banner identification, or descriptive error messages
-
CSV injection
-
Open redirects without demonstrated additional security impact
-
SSL/TLS configuration recommendations
-
Lack of SSL pinning in mobile apps
-
Lack of jailbreak detection in mobile apps
-
Cookie flags (missing HttpOnly / Secure)
-
Content-Security-Policy configuration opinions
-
Optional email security features (SPF, DKIM, DMARC)
-
Most issues related to rate limiting
-
Denial of service or distributed denial of service (DoS / DDoS)
-
Any testing that may affect availability of systems
-
Social engineering attacks (phishing, fake support requests)
-
Attacks that are noisy to users or admins (spamming notifications or forms)
-
Attacks against physical facilities
Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Changes
Tracked since 12 Nov 2026. Last checked 3 hours ago.
No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.
Public CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.
No CVEs matched yet. We match NVD records by vendor name, so products sold under another name can be missing.