Port of Antwerp-Bruges
Bug bounty on Intigriti portofantwerpbruges.com
- Top reward
- €4,500
- Top severity paid
- Critical
- Assets in scope
- 48
- Public CVEs
- 0
- Last change
At a glance
What to know before you start testing.
- Pays up to €4,500
- for critical bugs, from €50.
- Report on Intigriti
- Submit through the program page.
- Full safe harbor
- Good-faith research is authorised; no legal action.
- No public write-ups
- Keep findings private.
Rewards
What Intigriti lists as the payout for each severity.
| Severity | Relative size | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| Critical |
|
€4,500 from €2,500 |
| High |
|
€1,500 from €1,000 |
| Medium |
|
€500 from €350 |
| Low |
|
€100 from €50 |
- Safe harbor
-
Full
We respect the safe harbour clause that you can find below
Summarised with AI from the program policy on Intigriti, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Scope
48 assets you may test, 9 excluded.
Web 44
- api-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- api-accpt.portofantwerp.com
- api.portofantwerpbruges.com
- api.portofantwerp.com
- apps-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- apps-accpt.portofantwerp.com
- apps.portofantwerpbruges.com
- apps.portofantwerp.com
- digitalspecs.portofantwerpbruges.com
- erpx.unit4cloud.com/u4erx_pab_acp1
- erpx.unit4cloud.com/u4erx_pab_prev
- erpx.unit4cloud.com/u4erx_pab_prod
- login-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- login-test.portofantwerpbruges.com
- maximo-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- maximo-accpt.portofantwerp.com
- maximo.portofantwerpbruges.com
- maximo.portofantwerp.com
- my-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- my-accpt.portofantwerp.com
- my.portofantwerpbruges.com
- my.portofantwerp.com
- notula-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- oprc.portofantwerpbruges.com
- register-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- register-accpt.portofantwerp.com
- servicedesk-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- servicedesk-accpt.portofantwerp.com
- servicedesk.portofantwerpbruges.com
- servicedesk.portofantwerp.com
- share-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- share-accpt.portofantwerp.com
- share.portofantwerpbruges.com
- share.portofantwerp.com
- webapps-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- webapps-accpt.portofantwerp.com
- webapps.portofantwerpbruges.com
- webapps.portofantwerp.com
- webapps-test.portofantwerpbruges.com/xui
- wiki-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
- wiki-accpt.portofantwerp.com
- wiki.portofantwerpbruges.com
- wiki.portofantwerp.com
- www.portofantwerpbruges.com
Networks 2
- 188.118.8.0/25
- 94.107.237.192/26
Wildcard domains 2
- *.portofantwerpbruges.com
- *.portofantwerp.com
Out of scope (9)
- future.portofantwerpbruges.com
- future.portofantwerp.com
- jobs.portofantwerpbruges.com
- jobs.portofantwerp.com
- media.portofantwerpbruges.com
- media.portofantwerp.com
- register.portofantwerpbruges.com
- register.portofantwerp.com
- www.oursustainableport.com
Rules
What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Port of Antwerp-Bruges (via Intigriti)'s policy. "We" in these lines means the program, not this site.
While testing
-
Doing registrations on our websites without the use of an intigriti.me address
-
Please do *not* discuss or post vulnerabilities without our consent (including PoC's on YouTube and Vimeo)
-
Provide detailed but to-the point reproduction steps
-
Include a clear attack scenario. How will this affect us exactly?
-
Remember: quality over quantity!
Not accepted
-
API key disclosure without proven business impac
-
Wordpress usernames disclosure
-
Pre-Auth Account takeover/OAuth squatting
-
Self-XSS that cannot be used to exploit other users
-
Verbose messages/files/directory listings without disclosing any sensitive information
-
CORS misconfiguration on non-sensitive endpoints
-
Missing cookie flags
-
Missing security headers
-
Cross-site Request Forgery with no or low impact
-
Presence of autocomplete attribute on web forms
-
Reverse tabnabbing
-
Bypassing rate-limits or the non-existence of rate-limits.
-
Best practices violations (password complexity, expiration, re-use, etc.)
-
Clickjacking without proven impact/unrealistic user interaction
-
CSV Injection
-
Sessions not being invalidated (logout, enabling 2FA, etc.)
-
Tokens leaked to third parties
-
Anything related to email spoofing, SPF, DMARC or DKIM
-
Content injection without being able to modify the HTML
-
Username/email enumeration
-
Email bombing
-
HTTP Request smuggling without any proven impact
-
Homograph attacks
-
XMLRPC enabled
-
Banner grabbing/Version disclosure
Summarised with AI from the program policy on Intigriti, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Changes
Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 12 minutes ago.
No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.
Before we tracked it
Scope and reward changes recorded before this page started tracking it.
-
Scope removed
apps-accpt.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
share.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
digitalspecs.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
login-test.portofantwerpbruges.com/
-
Scope removed
www.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
maximo.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
share-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
maximo.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
future.portofantwerpbruges.com (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
servicedesk-accpt.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
my-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
api.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
my.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
media.portofantwerpbruges.com (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
apps.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
maximo-accpt.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
erpx.unit4cloud.com/u4erx_pab_prev
-
Scope removed
api-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
jobs.portofantwerp.com (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
*.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
wiki-accpt.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
register.portofantwerpbruges.com (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
register-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
register-accpt.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
share.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
api.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
wiki.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
webapps-test.portofantwerpbruges.com/xui
-
Scope removed
94.107.237.192/26
-
Scope removed
servicedesk.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
apps.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
*.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
my-accpt.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
erpx.unit4cloud.com/u4erx_pab_prod
-
Scope removed
www.oursustainableport.com (out of scope)
-
Scope removed
wiki.portofantwerpbruges.com
-
Scope removed
webapps.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
erpx.unit4cloud.com/u4erx_pab_acp1
-
Scope removed
api-accpt.portofantwerp.com
-
Scope removed
future.portofantwerp.com (out of scope)
Public CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.
No CVEs matched yet. We match NVD records by vendor name, so products sold under another name can be missing.
Original policy
Copied from www.intigriti.com on 12 Nov 2026. The summaries on this page are made from it; the live page may have changed since.
Description
The Antwerp-Bruges Port Authority has a key role in the port's day-to-day operation. The Port Authority manages and maintains the docks, the bridges, the locks, the quay walls and the land. The personnel is also responsible for safe shipping traffic in the docks, the bridges and locks. In addition, the Port Authority provides tugs and cranes, carries out dredging work and promotes the port at home and abroad.
Rules of engagement
Our promise to you
- We are happy to respond to any questions, please use the button in the right top corner for this.
- We respect the safe harbour clause that you can find below
Your promise to us
- Provide detailed but to-the point reproduction steps
- Include a clear attack scenario. How will this affect us exactly?
- Remember: quality over quantity!
- Please do not discuss or post vulnerabilities without our consent (including PoC's on YouTube and Vimeo)
In scope
The use of an intigriti.me address is mandatory at all times!
We are happy to announce our program! We've done our best to clean most of our known issues and now would like to request your help to spot the once we missed! We are specifically looking for
- CVE-2021- 44228 and all Log4Shell relating issues
- leaking of personal data
- horizontal / vertical privilege escalation
- SQLi
IMPORTANT: Some websites partially share the same codebase and can contain common issues. If a specific issue has already been found in another Port of Antwerp-Bruges website it will be treated as a duplicate.
Third‑party software, configuration, and integration We value all reports that help us improve our security, including those involving third‑party products that we use in our environment. To keep expectations clear and fair, we distinguish between vendor issues and issues caused by how we deploy or use these products.
-
Third‑party product vulnerabilities If a vulnerability is inherent to a third‑party product (SaaS or on‑prem) and is already known, documented, or acknowledged by the vendor (for example via a CVE, security advisory, or release notes), it will normally not be eligible for a reward under this program. In practice, if the issue can be reproduced generically in the product, outside of our environment, we will treat it as a vendor issue. We still appreciate receiving a report in such cases and may forward or coordinate it with the vendor, but we do not guarantee a bounty.
-
Our configuration, integration, and usage Vulnerabilities that arise from our own configuration, deployment, integration, or usage of third‑party products are in scope and can be eligible for rewards. Typical examples include misconfigured access controls, insecure exposure of admin or management interfaces, weak or hard‑coded settings in our deployment, or integration flaws that lead to privilege escalation, data access, or other security impact specifically in our environment.
-
How to position your report To help us assess your finding fairly and quickly, please clarify whether the issue depends on our configuration, integration, or usage, or whether it is a generic product vulnerability. Where possible, include:
-
Steps to reproduce the issue specifically in our environment
-
Any indicators that the problem is tied to our setup (for example, only occurs with our domain, tenant, or specific integration)
-
If you believe a known vendor issue has unique or higher impact because of how we use the product, please explain that impact clearly — we may still treat such cases more flexibly.
We aim to be transparent and respectful towards researchers. Even when a finding falls outside our reward scope, we will do our best to acknowledge your contribution and, where appropriate, coordinate with the relevant vendor. In exceptional cases, where we consider the effort and impact of your research to be particularly valuable, we may, at our discretion, grant a goodwill bonus, even if the finding is formally out of scope.
Rewards
Port of Antwerp-Bruges SWAG will be awarded for valid High+ submissions
Feedback Would you like to help us improve our program or have some feedback to share, please send your anonymous feedback here: Program Feedback Link Please note this form will be checked periodically and should not be used for submission or support queries.
Out of scope
Domains
- jobs.portofantwerp.com
- jobs.portofantwerpbruges.com
- media.portofantwerp.com
- media.portofantwerpbruges.com
- future.portofantwerp.com
- future.portofantwerpbruges.com
- register.portofantwerp.com
- register.portofantwerpbruges.com (NOTE: register-accpt.portofantwerpbruges.com and register-test.portofantwerpbruges.com are IN scope!)
Actions
Doing registrations on our websites without the use of an intigriti.me address
Application
- API key disclosure without proven business impac
- Wordpress usernames disclosure
- Pre-Auth Account takeover/OAuth squatting
- Self-XSS that cannot be used to exploit other users
- Verbose messages/files/directory listings without disclosing any sensitive information
- CORS misconfiguration on non-sensitive endpoints
- Missing cookie flags
- Missing security headers
- Cross-site Request Forgery with no or low impact
- Presence of autocomplete attribute on web forms
- Reverse tabnabbing
- Bypassing rate-limits or the non-existence of rate-limits.
- Best practices violations (password complexity, expiration, re-use, etc.)
- Clickjacking without proven impact/unrealistic user interaction
- CSV Injection
- Sessions not being invalidated (logout, enabling 2FA, etc.)
- Tokens leaked to third parties
- Anything related to email spoofing, SPF, DMARC or DKIM
- Content injection without being able to modify the HTML
- Username/email enumeration
- Email bombing
- HTTP Request smuggling without any proven impact
- Homograph attacks
- XMLRPC enabled
- Banner grabbing/Version disclosure
- Not stripping metadata of files
- Same-site scripting
- Subdomain takeover without taking over the subdomain
- Arbitrary file upload without proof of the existence of the uploaded file
- Blind SSRF without proven business impact (pingbacks are not sufficient)
- Disclosed/misconfigured Google Maps API keys
- Host header injection without proven business impact
General
- In case that a reported vulnerability was already known to the company from their own tests, it will be flagged as a duplicate
- Theoretical security issues with no realistic exploit scenario(s) or attack surfaces, or issues that would require complex end user interactions to be exploited
- Spam, social engineering and physical intrusion
- DoS/DDoS attacks or brute force attacks
- Vulnerabilities that only work on software that no longer receive security updates
- Attacks requiring physical access to a victim's computer/device, man in the middle or compromised user accounts
- Recently discovered zero-day vulnerabilities found in in-scope assets within 14 days after the public release of a patch or mitigation may be reported, but are usually not eligible for a bounty
- Reports that state that software is out of date/vulnerable without a proof-of-concept
Mobile
- Shared links leaked through the system clipboard
- Any URIs leaked because a malicious app has permission to view URIs opened
- The absence of certificate pinning
- Sensitive data in URLs/request bodies when protected by TLS
- Lack of obfuscation
- Path disclosure in the binary
- Self-XSS that cannot be used to exploit other users
- Lack of jailbreak & root detection
- Crashes due to malformed URL Schemes
- Lack of binary protection (anti-debugging) controls, mobile SSL pinning
- Snapshot/Pasteboard leakage
- Runtime hacking exploits (exploits only possible in a jailbroken environment)
- API key leakage used for insensitive activities/actions
- Attacks requiring physical access to the victim's device
- Attacks requiring installing malicious applications onto the victim's device
Severity
All our rewards are impact based, therefore we kindly ask you to carefully evaluate a vulnerability's impact when picking a severity rating. To give you an idea of what kind of bugs belong in a certain severity rating we've put some examples below. Note that depending on the impact a bug can sometimes be given a higher/lower severity rating.
Exceptional
- RCE (Remote Code Execution)
Critical
- SQL injection
- Authentication bypass on critical infrastructure
- Privilege escalation
High
- Access to all customer personal data
- Stored XSS without user interaction
Medium
- XSS
- CSRF with a significant impact
Low
- XSS that requires lots of user interaction ( > 3 steps)
- CSRF with a very limited impact
Port of Antwerp-Bruges is following intigriti's standard view on severity assessment and impact analysis. More information can be found on: https://go.intigriti.com/triage-standards
FAQ
Where can we get credentials for the app?
We currently don’t offer any credentials to test user roles.