Revolut VDP
By Revolut Vulnerability disclosure program on Intigriti revolut.com
- Top reward
- No cash rewards
- Top severity paid
- Not published
- Assets in scope
- 1
- Public CVEs
- 0
- Last change
At a glance
What to know before you start testing.
- No cash rewards
- A disclosure program: you report for credit, not money.
- Report on Intigriti
- Submit through the program page.
- Full safe harbor
- Good-faith research is authorised; no legal action.
- No public write-ups
- Keep findings private.
Rewards
What Intigriti lists as the payout for each severity.
This program does not pay cash rewards.
Scope
1 asset you may test.
Web 1
- All domains of Revolut
Rules
What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Revolut VDP (via Intigriti)'s policy.
While testing
-
Respect the scope of the program
-
Never use or target accounts you don't have explicit permission to do so with
-
Not discuss or disclose vulnerability information without prior written consent
Not accepted
-
Theoretical security issues with no realistic exploit scenario(s) or attack surfaces
-
Issues based upon social engineering or physical access to a victim's device
-
Attacks requiring person-in-the-middle or compromised user accounts
-
DoS/DDoS attacks
-
Reports that state that software is out of date/vulnerable without a proof-of-concept
-
Cloud credentials / keys without proving exploitability
-
API key leakage used for insensitive activities/actions
-
Verbose messages / files / directory listings without disclosing any sensitive information
-
Anything related to email spoofing, SPF, DMARC or DKIM
-
API key disclosure without proven business impact
-
Pre-Auth Account takeover / OAuth squatting
-
Self-XSS that cannot be used to exploit other users
-
CORS misconfiguration on non-sensitive endpoints
-
Missing cookie flags (`HttpOnly`, `Secure`, `SameSite`, etc.)
-
Missing security-related HTTP headers (`X-XSS-Protection`, `X-Frame-Options`, etc.)
-
Cross-site Request Forgery with no or low impact
-
Presence of autocomplete attribute on web forms
-
Reverse tabnabbing
-
Best practices violations (password complexity, expiration, re-use, etc.)
-
Clickjacking without proven impact/unrealistic user interaction
-
CSV Injection
-
Content injection without being able to modify the HTML
-
HTTP Request smuggling without any proven impact
-
Homograph attacks
-
XML-RPC enabled
Summarised with AI from the program policy on Intigriti, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Changes
Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 17 minutes ago.
No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.
Before we tracked it
Scope and reward changes recorded before this page started tracking it.
-
Scope removed
All domains of Revolut
Public CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.
No CVEs matched yet. We match NVD records by vendor name, so products sold under another name can be missing.
Original policy
Copied from www.intigriti.com on 12 Nov 2026. The summaries on this page are made from it; the live page may have changed since.
Description
Revolut is a financial technology company that offers banking services. It offers accounts featuring currency exchange, debit cards, virtual cards, interest-bearing "vaults", commission-free stock trading, crypto, commodities, and other services to over 80M customers.
Please visit our website for more information: www.revolut.com
Rules of engagement
By participating in this program, you agree to:
- Respect the Community Code of Conduct
- Respect the Intigriti Terms and Conditions
- Respect the scope of the program
- Never use or target accounts you don't have explicit permission to do so with
- Not discuss or disclose vulnerability information without prior written consent
In scope
ℹ️ Introduction
We are happy to announce our program! We've done our best to clean up our known issues and now would like to request your help to spot the ones we missed!
⭐ Reports identified as falling within the scope of our private bug bounty program will be transferred for consideration and potential reward through that dedicated program.
🗣️ Feedback
Would you like to help us improve our program or have some feedback to share, please send your anonymous feedback here:
Please note this form will be checked periodically and should not be used for submission or support queries.
Out of scope
General
- In case that a reported vulnerability was already known to the company from their own tests, it will be flagged as a duplicate
- Theoretical security issues with no realistic exploit scenario(s) or attack surfaces
- Issues based upon social engineering or physical access to a victim's device
- Attacks requiring person-in-the-middle or compromised user accounts
- DoS/DDoS attacks
- Reports that state that software is out of date/vulnerable without a proof-of-concept
- Cloud credentials / keys without proving exploitability
- API key leakage used for insensitive activities/actions
- Verbose messages / files / directory listings without disclosing any sensitive information
- Anything related to email spoofing, SPF, DMARC or DKIM
Web Applications and APIs
- API key disclosure without proven business impact
- Pre-Auth Account takeover / OAuth squatting
- Self-XSS that cannot be used to exploit other users
- CORS misconfiguration on non-sensitive endpoints
- Missing cookie flags (
HttpOnly,Secure,SameSite, etc.) - Missing security-related HTTP headers (
X-XSS-Protection,X-Frame-Options, etc.) - Cross-site Request Forgery with no or low impact
- Presence of autocomplete attribute on web forms
- Reverse tabnabbing
- Best practices violations (password complexity, expiration, re-use, etc.)
- Clickjacking without proven impact/unrealistic user interaction
- CSV Injection
- Content injection without being able to modify the HTML
- HTTP Request smuggling without any proven impact
- Homograph attacks
- XML-RPC enabled
- Banner grabbing/Version disclosure
- Not stripping metadata of files
- Same-site scripting
- Subdomain takeover without taking over the subdomain
- Arbitrary file upload without proof of the existence of the uploaded file
- Blind SSRF without proven business impact (pingbacks are not sufficient)
- Host header injection without proven business impact
Mobile
- Shared links leaked through the system clipboard
- Any URIs leaked because a malicious app has permission to view URIs opened
- Sensitive data in URLs/request bodies when protected by TLS
- Path disclosure in the binary
- Crashes due to malformed URL Schemes
Severity
This program follows Intigriti's triage standards for risk ratings.
FAQ
Where can we get credentials for the app?
We currently don’t offer any credentials to test user roles.