Stellar.org
By Stellar Development Foundation Vulnerability disclosure program on HackerOne stellar.org
- Top reward
- No cash rewards
- Top severity paid
- Critical
- Assets in scope
- 15
- Public CVEs
- 0
- Last change
At a glance
What to know before you start testing.
- No cash rewards
- A disclosure program: you report for credit, not money.
- Report through their form
- hackerone.com/stellar/reports/new
- Partial safe harbor
- Some legal protection; read the terms.
- Replies within 3 days
- As the policy promises.
- Paid by XLM
- Proof of identity needed to get paid.
- Publish after a fix
- Coordinate the timing with the company.
Rewards
What HackerOne lists as the payout for each severity.
| Severity | Relative size | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| Critical |
|
$25,000 |
| High |
|
$15,000 |
| Medium |
|
$10,000 |
| Low |
|
$2,000 |
- Top reward
-
$250,000
For Critical Blockchain/DLT bugs in carveout assets, the reward amount is 10% of the funds directly affected, capped at the maximum reward of 250,000 points.
- Response
-
Within 3 days
Please allow 3 business days for an initial response before following up
- Safe harbor
-
Partial
Violation of this policy or any of the terms incorporated by reference may result in removal from the program and forfeiture of any bounty.
Summarised with AI from the program policy on HackerOne, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Scope
15 assets you may test, 11 excluded.
Source code 10
- bytes-lit
- crate-git-revision
- js-stellar-sdk
- rs-soroban-env
- rs-soroban-sdk
- rs-stellar-strkey
- rs-stellar-xdr
- stellar-cli
- stellar-core
- wasmi
Web 5
- https://communityfund.stellar.org
- https://developers.stellar.org
- https://launch.stellar.org
- https://www.stellar.org
- https://www.stellar.org/account-viewer
Out of scope (11)
- All test files
- Any exploit that requires a quorum of validators
- Any feature behind a BUILD_TESTS flag
- Any security issue arising from collusion of node blocking set
- Archived GitHub repositories and projects
- For MEV attacks, probabilistic/brute-force transaction ordering approaches
- GitHub repository forks
- Offline commands
- Repositories that explicitly state they are out of scope
- stellar-core's built-in HTTP command and query endpoints
- Vulnerabilities affecting third-party applications that consume Stellar APIs
Rules
What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Stellar.org (via HackerOne)'s policy. "We" in these lines means the program, not this site.
While testing
-
Testing on mainnet or public testnet; all testing must be performed on local instances
-
Phishing or social engineering attacks against SDF employees, contractors, or users
-
Denial of service attacks against any SDF-operated or Stellar network infrastructure
-
Automated scanning or fuzzing that generates significant traffic against production services
-
Testing against third-party systems, applications, or websites (including SSO providers and CDNs)
-
Public disclosure of an unpatched vulnerability before receiving express written consent from SDF
-
Please use your local instance of Horizon or Stellar-RPC and a separate network, not testnet or pubnet, when researching security bugs where possible.
Not accepted
-
SPF or DMARC issues
-
CORS headers on endpoints that are intentionally accessible from other domains
-
Issues with third party services we use, such as Mailgun or Segment
-
Logout CSRF
-
Vulnerabilities in third party libraries without a working exploit against our applications or servers
-
Publicly readable AWS S3 buckets containing Stellar ledger history
-
Content Delivery Network bypass
-
Version disclosure
-
Missing security headers
-
Cookies without the secure flag
-
Recently disclosed 0-day vulnerabilities without demonstrated impact to our environment
-
Vulnerabilities that depend on physical access, social engineering, spam, or DDoS
-
Vulnerabilities affecting outdated or unpatched browsers
-
Issues that are not reproducible
-
Archived GitHub repositories or projects
-
GitHub repository forks
-
DoS vectors requiring brute-force paid transaction flooding
Summarised with AI from the program policy on HackerOne, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Changes
Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 30 minutes ago.
No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.
Before we tracked it
Scope and reward changes recorded before this page started tracking it.
-
Rules updated
Added: “[js-stellar-sdk](https://github.com/stellar/js-stellar-sdk) — Stellar JS SDK”
-
Rules updated
Added: “…ode’s stellar-core config allows them to join the network. However, if this exploit requires a malicious Tier-1 validator organization to corrupt every other...”
Public CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.
No CVEs matched yet. We match NVD records by vendor name, so products sold under another name can be missing.
Original policy
Copied from hackerone.com on 12 Nov 2026. The summaries on this page are made from it; the live page may have changed since.
Overview
The Stellar Bug Bounty Program provides bounties for vulnerabilities and exploits discovered in Stellar Development Foundation maintained repositories, services, and infrastructure, as well as in the Stellar protocol and core consensus implementation. We recognize the importance of our community and security researchers in helping identify bugs and issues. We encourage responsible disclosure of security vulnerabilities through the bug bounty program described on this page.
Stellar is a layer-1 open-source, decentralized, peer-to-peer blockchain network that provides a framework for developers to create applications, issue assets, and connect to existing financial rails. Soroban is the smart contracts platform that integrates with and works alongside the Stellar blockchain.
#Program Transition
Effective 7 MAY 2026, SDF has consolidated its bug bounty programs into this single HackerOne program. The Stellar ImmuneFi program at immunefi.com/bug-bounty/stellar is deprecated. Reports previously submitted through ImmuneFi will continue to be honored and processed under the terms in effect at the time of submission. All new reports should be submitted through HackerOne. This policy does not modify, supersede, or administer any separate OpenZeppelin Stellar Contracts bounty unless SDF expressly states otherwise in writing.
Primacy of Rules
Stellar adheres to the Primacy of Rules. The whole bug bounty program is run strictly under the terms and conditions stated within this page.
Scope
This program covers SDF maintained open-source repositories, services, applications, and websites, as well as the Stellar protocol and core consensus implementation. In-scope assets are organized into two groups, each with its own reward scale (defined in the Rewards section below).
In scope — Standard reward scale
Open-source repositories:
- All open-source projects under the Stellar GitHub organization, unless a repository explicitly states that it is out of scope or falls under the Protocol and Core Carveout below
Online services, apps, and websites:
- https://www.stellar.org
- https://www.stellar.org/account-viewer
- https://launch.stellar.org
- https://developers.stellar.org
- https://communityfund.stellar.org
In scope — Protocol and Core Carveout (alternative reward scale)
The following assets are in scope at the alternative Protocol and Core Carveout reward scale:
- stellar-core — Reference implementation of the Stellar Consensus Protocol
- bytes-lit — Bytes array library
- rs-stellar-strkey — Rust strkeys library
- stellar-cli — Soroban CLI
- rs-stellar-xdr — Rust XDR library
- rs-soroban-env — Soroban contract engine environment
- crate-git-revision — Rust crate git version management library
- wasmi — Wasmi fork
- rs-soroban-sdk — Soroban Rust SDK
- js-stellar-sdk — Stellar JS SDK
Out of scope
- Archived GitHub repositories and projects
- GitHub repository forks
- Repositories that explicitly state they are out of scope
- Vulnerabilities affecting third-party applications that consume Stellar APIs
- Any security issue arising from collusion of node blocking set is out of scope for bug bounty programs.
- Any exploit that requires a quorum of validators.
- For MEV attacks, probabilistic/brute-force transaction ordering approaches (i.e. attacker sends many semantically identical TXs in order for one to execute first) out of scope.
- Any feature behind a BUILD_TESTS flag is out of scope.
- All test files are out of scope.
- Offline commands are out of scope.
- Issues that depend on malicious or incorrect data from external data providers used by tools such as Lab, CLI, or similar interfaces.
- stellar-core's built-in HTTP command and query endpoints are intended for private operator/local infrastructure use only. They are not public network APIs and are not meant to be exposed to untrusted/public internet traffic. Bounty reports requiring direct public exposure of these endpoints are out of scope unless they demonstrate impact under the supported private/local deployment model.
NOTE: For assets identified "In Scope", only code that has been released (present in the release tags) at the time of the vulnerability report is eligible. Vulnerabilities in the previous protocol versions are out of scope. Code residing on development, feature branches and any code tagged or documented as unreleased, experimental, or behind a feature flag not yet enabled on the Stellar public network, is out of scope. If a vulnerability exists on both an in-scope and out-of-scope branch, the report is eligible only if the vulnerable code is reachable in the default branch build.
Eligibility
Generally speaking, any bug that poses a significant vulnerability to the security or integrity of Stellar Development Foundation maintained applications, services, or infrastructure, or to the Stellar protocol or core consensus implementation, could be eligible for a reward. However, it is entirely at our discretion to decide whether a bug is significant enough to qualify.
In general, anything with the potential for financial loss or data breach is considered sufficiently severe, including:
- Implementation bugs that can lead to financial loss
- Access to our production servers
- Remote Code Execution
- Crash bugs in Stellar-RPC or Horizon, for example a bug that can crash the application by sending a special request, not by sending thousands of requests
- Vulnerabilities matching the impact categories listed in the Protocol and Core Carveout severity matrix below
The following reports are submitted very often and will generally be marked as Not Applicable:
- SPF or DMARC issues
- CORS headers on endpoints that are intentionally accessible from other domains
- Issues with third party services we use, such as Mailgun or Segment
- Logout CSRF
- Vulnerabilities in third party libraries without a working exploit against our applications or servers
- Publicly readable AWS S3 buckets containing Stellar ledger history, because this data is public
- Content Delivery Network bypass
In general, the following would not meet the threshold for severity and may be marked as Not Applicable:
- Version disclosure
- Missing security headers
- Cookies without the secure flag
- Recently disclosed 0-day vulnerabilities without demonstrated impact to our environment
- Vulnerabilities on sites hosted by third parties unless they lead to a vulnerability on an in-scope Stellar property
- Vulnerabilities that depend on physical access, social engineering, spam, or DDoS
- Vulnerabilities affecting outdated or unpatched browsers
- Vulnerabilities in third party applications that make use of Stellar APIs
- Reports that have not been responsibly investigated and documented
- Bugs already known to us, or already reported by another researcher, where the reward goes to the first valid reporter
- Issues that are not reproducible
- Issues that we cannot reasonably be expected to remediate
- Archived GitHub repositories or projects
- GitHub repository forks
- DoS vectors requiring brute-force paid transaction flooding (economically expensive, out of scope)
- Network settings causing out-of-bounds issues, since settings are manually proposed and evaluated by validators
- Security issues arising from collusion of a node blocking set
Rewards
We reward researchers who find valid security issues with a bounty paid in lumens (XLM), denominated in USD. Payouts are handled by the Stellar team directly.
The reward scale that applies to a report depends on which assets are affected:
- The Standard reward scale applies to all in-scope assets except those listed under the Protocol and Core Carveout.
- The Protocol and Core Carveout reward scale applies to vulnerabilities in
stellar-core,stellar-protocol, and the Soroban runtime/host code.
Standard reward scale
The Stellar.org Bug Bounty Panel evaluates award size using technical severity calculated with CVSS v3.1 Base Score together with business impact, such as the affected asset, the number of impacted participants, the sensitivity of exposed data, and the financial or reputational consequences to the network. Reports with higher business impact may receive higher rewards than reports with lower business impact, even when the technical severity is the same. Final awards are determined at the sole discretion of the panel.
- Critical: 0 to 25,000 points
- High: 0 to 15,000 points
- Medium: 0 to 10,000 points
- Low: 0 to 2,000 points
- Note: 0 to 500 points
1 point currently corresponds to 1 USD, payable in lumens (XLM), though this may change without prior notice.
Researchers are more likely to earn a larger reward by demonstrating how a vulnerability can be exploited to its maximum practical impact.
Protocol and Core Carveout reward scale
The following alternative reward scale applies exclusively to vulnerabilities in the carveout scope mentioned above:
- Critical: 0 to 25,000 points
- High: 0 to 15,000
- Medium: 0 to 10,000
- Low: 0 to 1,000
Critical reward calculation for carveout assets
For Critical Blockchain/DLT bugs in carveout assets, the reward amount is 10% of the funds directly affected, capped at the maximum reward of 250,000 points.
Severity classification for carveout assets
For carveout assets, severity is determined using the OWASP risk rating methodology rather than CVSS. To use the calculator:
- Determine the severity by looking at the Impact Category that best matches the vulnerability in the severity lookup matrix below.
- Evaluate how easy and likely it is to exploit the vulnerability. Typically, if the exploit needs a malicious tier-1* to pull off the attack, then severity goes down at least one level (for example, High to Medium).
* Tier-1 here refers to the transitive quorum, given the state of the network today. If in the future the quorum changes, this language would need to be re-evaluated.
Severity lookup matrix
| Impact Category | Trivial to exploit | Requires tier-1 access |
|---|---|---|
| Direct theft / loss of funds | Critical | Critical |
| Total network halt | Critical | High - Medium (mitigation dependent) |
| Affects XLM supply integrity (minting, burning) | Critical | High |
| Fund freeze | Critical | High |
| Observable non-determinism causing divergence | Critical | High |
| Fee pool exploits | High | Medium |
| Soroban runtime bug putting realistic Smart contracts at risk of plausible malfunction | High | - |
| No combination of the Tier-1 validator organization in a new node's stellar-core quorum set config allows them to join the network | High | Medium |
| Increase resource consumption that can cause slowdown of 5 seconds or more | Medium | Low |
| Increase memory consumption more than 20% of the recommended hardware specification | Medium | Low |
| Soroban simulation library causing Stellar RPC crash | Medium | - |
| MEV / transaction ordering manipulation | Medium | - |
| Bypass Soroban rent fee mechanism paying less than 20% of actual | Medium | Low |
| Shut down of greater than 30% of watcher nodes (network unaffected) | Medium | Low |
| Bypass Soroban rent fee mechanism paying between 21% to 99% | Low | Informational |
| DoS by less than or equal to 30% consumption of CPU/Memory resources | Low | Informational |
| Increase resource consumption that can cause slowdown of more than 1 second but less than 5 seconds | Low | Informational |
| Increase memory consumption more than 5% but less than 20% of the recommended hardware specification | Low | Informational |
| Shut down of 10% to 30% of (network unaffected) | Low | Informational |
| Minor metering discrepancy that can cause slowdown between 2 and 5 seconds | Low | Informational |
| Trivial metering discrepancy that can cause slowdown less than 2 seconds | Informational | Informational |
Severity, impact and examples
The examples below should be evaluated in the context of the hardware specifications described at https://developers.stellar.org/docs/validators/admin-guide/prerequisites#hardware-requirements.
| Severity | Impact Description | Concrete Example |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Direct theft or irreversible loss of funds excluding fees burned | *Payout would be a % of loss of funds |
| Critical | Total network halt — network cannot confirm new transactions | Example 1: Auth stack exhaustion causing all validator nodes to crash. Example 2: XDR recursion depth limits causing stack overflow. Example 3: Oversized duplicate SCP message crashing a node via flow control invariant abort. *Mitigation mechanism determines the severity. If it is easy to mitigate by removing a Tier-1 from another's config then it is medium severity. If a new software package is needed then it is high severity. |
| Critical | Minting of native asset (XLM) outside of protocol rules | Integer overflow in fee validation enabling creation of XLM from nothing |
| Critical | Permanent freezing of funds | Bug in Soroban contract storage that makes persistent entries permanently inaccessible |
| Critical | Observable non-determinism causing divergence | Floating-point or platform-dependent behavior in Soroban host functions producing different ledger hashes across validator architectures (e.g., ARM vs x86) |
| Medium | A malicious Tier-1 validator able to halt the entire network | A tier-1 validator crafting malformed SCP messages that cause all other tier-1 nodes to crash |
| High | Fee pool exploits | A user submits a transaction that drains the Fee Pool thus stealing XLM |
| High | Soroban runtime bug putting realistic Smart contracts at risk of plausible malfunction | Examples: unauthorized call gets authorized, SCVal stored in storage gets corrupted, error code gets lost, cryptographic function "validates" invalid input, wrong contract gets invoked, wrong event emitted. |
| High | New nodes unable to join the network due to corrupt history archive of all Tier-1 validator organizations | A bug that corrupts the history archive of every Tier-1 validator organization thus preventing new nodes from joining the network. No combination of Tier-1 validator organizations in the [[VALIDATORS]] array in the new node’s stellar-core config allows them to join the network. However, if this exploit requires a malicious Tier-1 validator organization to corrupt every other Tier-1 validator’s history archive then the severity would drop to a Low. |
| Medium | Metering discrepancy in Soroban that can lead to resource exhaustion | Soroban host functions undercharging CPU or memory resources by 50 times such that an attacker can produce measurable slowdown |
| Medium | Increase resource consumption that can cause slowdown of 5 seconds or more | Specially crafted Soroban contract invocation that triggers excessive disk I/O during ledger close, slowing all validators |
| Medium | Increase memory consumption more than 20% of the recommended hardware specification | |
| Medium | Soroban simulation library bug causing Stellar RPC to crash | Bug in Soroban simulation library causing Stellar RPC nodes to crash when running simulation |
| Medium | MEV attack or any transaction ordering manipulation | Bug where attacker can deterministically cause a transaction to execute before a victim transaction |
| Low | Shut down of greater than 30% of watcher nodes – network is unaffected and continues to close ledgers | Peer-to-peer flood message causing non-tier-1 watchers to disconnect |
| Low | DoS by causing less than 30% of CPU/memory resource consumption on nodes outside of the declared limits and without brute force | Specially crafted Soroban contract invocation that triggers moderate disk I/O during ledger close, slowing all validators |
| Low | Bypass of transaction fee mechanism enabling free or severely underpriced transactions | TxSet baseFee integer overflow bypassing fee validation entirely |
| Low | Exploit Soroban rent fee mechanism | Any exploit that can get access to free rent for persistent Soroban entries. |
| Informational | Minor metering discrepancy causing undercounting of Soroban transactions | Undercharging in Soroban host function that cannot be exploited to DoS the network or cause any significant slowdown. |
| Informational | DoS vector requiring brute-force (paid transaction flooding) | Submitting thousands of max-fee transactions to slow ledger close — economically expensive and out of scope |
| Informational | Network settings causing out of bounds issues | Settings are manually proposed and thoroughly evaluated by validators so there is no risk of going out of bounds |
| Informational | New nodes unable to join the network | Corrupt history causing a new node to not be able to join |
Reward payment terms
Rewards are denominated in USD-equivalent points and paid in XLM. XLM conversion will be determined under Section 1.6 of SDF’s Bounty Program eligibility guidelines at https://stellar.org/grants-and-funding/bug-bounty, as updated by SDF from time to time. As of the date of this policy, that methodology uses the CF Stellar Lumens-Dollar Settlement Price under ticker XLMUSD_RR, or a comparable provider selected by SDF if unavailable, on the day the award is scheduled to be distributed
To receive a payout, researchers must successfully complete valid KYC before payment is issued.
KYC Requirement
The submission of KYC information is a requirement for payout processing. Stellar will request the following information in order to pay for successful bug submissions:
- Full name
- Date of birth
- Proof of address (either a redacted bank statement with address or a recent utility bill)
- Copy of Passport or other Government issued ID
- Tax form (W-9 / W-8BEN / W-8BEN-E)
Tax information is also required.
Participants must adhere to the Eligibility Criteria stated in this policy.
Submission Requirements
A Proof of Concept (PoC) demonstrating the bug's impact is required for all severities and all in-scope assets, including those in the Protocol and Core Carveout. All reports, regardless of severity, must include:
- A description of the vulnerability and the affected asset
- Step by step reproduction (Proof of Concept), including actual requests, responses, or an exploit script
- A clear impact statement tied to confidentiality, integrity, or availability
- Evidence that the issue is reproducible, such as screenshots, logs, transaction IDs, or a minimal working script
- Affected GitHub Repository URL (required): every report must include the GitHub repository the vulnerability is in, in the form https://github.com/stellar/ (for example, https://github.com/stellar/stellar-core). Enter NA only if the repository field is not applicable or you don't know it.
- For reports against https://github.com/stellar/anchor-platform, follow the report format mentioned at https://github.com/stellar/anchor-platform/blob/develop/SECURITY.md.
Reports submitted without a sufficient PoC will be triaged as Needs More Info and will not be eligible for payout until a sufficient PoC is provided.
Best Practices
- Please use your local instance of Horizon or Stellar-RPC and a separate network, not testnet or pubnet, when researching security bugs where possible. For example, you can use our Docker image. Blockchains are public, and someone may observe your findings and report a bug before you do.
- For issues that depend on a specific runtime or environment, we strongly encourage a containerized Proof of Concept, such as a Dockerfile, when it materially improves reproducibility.
#Prohibited Activities
The following activities are prohibited under this program:
- Testing on mainnet or public testnet; all testing must be performed on local instances
- Phishing or social engineering attacks against SDF employees, contractors, or users
- Denial of service attacks against any SDF-operated or Stellar network infrastructure
- Automated scanning or fuzzing that generates significant traffic against production services
- Testing against third-party systems, applications, or websites (including SSO providers and CDNs)
- Public disclosure of an unpatched vulnerability before receiving express written consent from SDF
- Any activities that violate applicable laws or regulations
Responsible Disclosure
Our development team may take up to 90 days to implement a fix based on the severity of the report. Please allow this process to fully complete before requesting permission to publicly disclose a vulnerability. All public disclosures must be done only at the express consent of SDF.
Bug reports covering previously-discovered bugs are not eligible for a reward within this program. This includes known issues that the project is aware of but has consciously decided not to "fix", necessary code changes, or any implemented operational mitigating procedures that can lessen potential risk. Researchers should check the relevant GitHub repositories' issues marked with a security label to make sure a vulnerability has not been published already.
Report a Bug
- Submit your report at https://hackerone.com/stellar/reports/new
- Include as much detail as possible, including a description of the issue, its potential impact, and clear reproduction steps or a Proof of Concept
- Please allow 3 business days for an initial response before following up
Legal
Participation in this program is subject to the eligibility criteria of this policy as well as the eligibility criteria published at https://stellar.org/grants-and-funding/bug-bounty, the HackerOne platform terms applicable to the Participant’s use of HackerOne, and the SDF Terms of Service available at https://stellar.org/terms-of-service, all of which are incorporated by reference. If there is a conflict, this policy controls with respect to program scope, vulnerability severity classification, report submission requirements, disclosure requirements, and reward amounts; SDF’s Bounty Program eligibility guidelines control with respect to participant eligibility, compliance checks, tax documentation, XLM conversion, and payout eligibility; and the SDF Terms of Service control for all other matters.
You may not participate in this program if you are a resident of, or are located in, a country that appears on any U.S. sanctions list, or if you are identified on the OFAC Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list.
SDF may modify, suspend, or terminate this program, including any scope, eligibility, severity, reward, or payout term, at any time. Unless SDF states otherwise, changes apply only to submissions made after the updated policy is posted.
Violation of this policy or any of the terms incorporated by reference may result in removal from the program and forfeiture of any bounty.
Stellar Terminology Reference
Stellar's architecture differs from typical PoW/PoS blockchains. The following glossary defines Stellar concepts that are referenced throughout this policy and that researchers from other ecosystems may find useful.
| Stellar Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Stellar Consensus Protocol (SCP) | Proof of Agreement mechanism to apply a set of transactions that go into a block. Validators reach consensus through quorum slices — overlapping sets of trusted validators. See https://stellar.org/learn/stellar-consensus-protocol and https://developers.stellar.org/docs/learn/fundamentals/stellar-consensus-protocol |
| stellar-core | Reference implementation of the Stellar Consensus Protocol (SCP). Maintains the ledger, proposes/votes on transactions via SCP, applies the block, and publishes ledger updates. See https://github.com/stellar/stellar-core/tree/master/docs |
| Soroban runtime | Rust contract-environment interface and host implementation for Soroban. |
| Tier-1 Validator | Publicly identified validator organizations trusted by most of the network. They carry network safety and liveness. See https://developers.stellar.org/docs/validators/tier-1-orgs |
| Quorum Slice Set | The set of validators a node trusts for consensus. Each validator defines its own quorum slice. Quorum intersection across slices ensures network agreement. |
| Node blocking set | Any set of nodes in a quorum set that prevent a node from reaching agreement. Any security issue arising from collusion of a node blocking set is out of scope for the bug bounty program. |
| Overlay Network | Peer-to-peer network connecting stellar-core nodes. Handles message broadcast, flow control, and peer management. |
| Transaction Set | The batch of transactions proposed by a leader node and agreed upon by SCP. Apply order is shuffled to mitigate front-running. |
| Ledger | Represents the state of the Stellar network at a point in time. It is shared across all stellar-core nodes in the network and contains the list of accounts, account balances, orders on the distributed exchange, smart contract code and data, etc. |
| Fee Pool | Non-circulating XLM collected from transaction fees. It is not redistributed but may change in the future. |
| Surge Pricing | When operations exceed capacity (~1,000 ops/ledger), or if there is competition between smart contract transactions for a particular resource like CPU instructions, ledger entry accesses (reads and writes), ledger IO (bytes read and bytes written), and the total size of transactions to be applied. See https://developers.stellar.org/docs/learn/fundamentals/fees-resource-limits-metering#surge-pricing |
| Smart contract metering | Resource accounting system that measures and charges for computational resources during smart contract execution. See https://developers.stellar.org/docs/learn/fundamentals/fees-resource-limits-metering |
| Rent | Storing smart contract executable and its corresponding data on chain requires rent to be paid so that these entries are considered live until their Time-to-live (TTL) ledger. See https://developers.stellar.org/docs/learn/fundamentals/contract-development/storage/state-archival#ttl |
| Herder | The SCP driver subclass inside stellar-core that bridges consensus with the overlay and ledger manager. |
| Catchup / Replay | Process where a node downloads and replays missed ledgers to sync with the network. |