- Top reward
- $100,000
- Top severity paid
- Critical
- Assets in scope
- 11
- Public CVEs
- 24
- Last change
At a glance
What to know before you start testing.
- Pays up to $100,000
- for critical bugs, from $100.
- Report by email
- [email protected]
- Partial safe harbor
- Some legal protection; read the terms.
- Publish after a fix
- Coordinate the timing with the company.
Rewards
What Bugcrowd lists as the payout for each severity.
| Severity | Relative size | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| Critical |
|
$100,000 from $3,000 |
| High |
|
$50,000 from $500 |
| Medium |
|
$20,000 from $200 |
| Low |
|
$10,000 from $100 |
| Informational |
|
$500 |
- Safe harbor
-
Full
To encourage responsible reporting, we will not take legal action against you nor ask law enforcement to investigate you, so long as you comply with the Terms.
Summarised with AI from the program policy on Bugcrowd, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Earlier reward tables (1)
- 11 Nov 2026 to 11 Nov 2026: Critical up to $100,000
Scope
11 assets you may test, 14 excluded.
Wildcard domains 6
- *.solarcity.com
- *.tesla.cn
- *.tesla.com
- *.teslainsuranceservices.com
- *.teslamotors.com
- *.tesla.services
Hardware and IoT 2
- Tesla Energy hardware you own
- Tesla vehicle hardware that you own
Android apps 1
- https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.teslamotors.tesla&hl=en_US&gl=US
iOS apps 1
- https://apps.apple.com/us/app/tesla/id582007913
Web 1
- Any host verified to be owned by Tesla Motors Inc. (domains/IP space/etc.)
Out of scope (14)
- Any domains from acquisitions, such as maxwell.com
- Any other third-party websites hosted by non-Tesla entities
- employeefeedback.tesla.com
- energysupport.tesla.com (you can report vulnerabilities to bugbounty.zoho.com)
- feedback.tesla.com
- feedback.teslamotors.com
- https://engage.tesla.com
- ir.tesla.com
- ir.teslamotors.com
- mkto.teslamotors.com
- service.tesla.cn/docs/*
- service.tesla.com/docs/*
- shop.eu.teslamotors.com
- *.engage.tesla.com
Rules
What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Tesla (via Bugcrowd)'s policy. "We" in these lines means the program, not this site.
While testing
-
Do not access or modify data that does not belong to you
-
Immediately stop your activities
-
Make a good faith effort to avoid privacy violations, destruction of data, and interruption or degradation of our services.
-
Give Tesla a reasonable time to correct the issue before making any information public.
-
You may not disclose confirmed, unresolved vulnerabilities without approval from Tesla.
-
Research must be done using your own account or Tesla products that you own.
-
Do not attempt to use brute force or denial of service attacks on Tesla-owned systems without prior written approval.
-
you must first register the hardware with Tesla via [email protected]
-
Please refrain from spamming forms (order forms, contact forms, etc) with high numbers of requests.
Not accepted
-
WAF bypass
-
Open redirects / Lack of security speedbump when leaving the site
-
Internal IP address disclosure
-
Social engineering / phishing attacks
-
Self XSS
-
Text injection
-
Email spoofing
-
Descriptive error messages
-
Clickjacking and issues only exploitable through clickjacking
-
Lack of rate limiting
-
HTTPS mixed content scripts
-
Missing HTTP security headers
-
TLS/SSL Issues
-
Denial of Service attacks
-
Out-of-date software
-
Physical attacks against Tesla's Facilities / Property
-
Relay attacks
-
Hardware-based glitching and side-channel attacks
-
Tesla-specific known issues
-
Chromium and/or Webkit bugs, unless chained with a full sandbox escape
Summarised with AI from the program policy on Bugcrowd, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Changes
Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 1 hour ago.
No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.
Before we tracked it
Scope and reward changes recorded before this page started tracking it.
-
Scope added
Any other third-party websites hosted by non-Tesla entities (out of scope)
-
Scope added
Any domains from acquisitions, such as maxwell.com (out of scope)
-
Scope added
service.tesla.cn/docs/* (out of scope)
-
Scope added
service.tesla.com/docs/* (out of scope)
-
Scope added
energysupport.tesla.com (you can report vulnerabilities to bugbounty.zoho.com) (out of scope)
-
Scope added
Any host verified to be owned by Tesla Motors Inc. (domains/IP space/etc.)
Public CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.
| CVE | Summary | Severity | Published |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-8320 | Tesla Wall Connector Content-Length Header Improper Input Validation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Tesla Wall Connector devices. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of the HTTP Content-Length header. The issue resul | High 8.8 | 30 Jul 2025 |
| CVE-2025-8321 | Tesla Wall Connector Firmware Downgrade Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Tesla Wall Connector devices. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the firmware upgrade feature. The issue results from the lack of an anti-downgrade mechanism. An attacker can l | Medium 6.8 | 30 Jul 2025 |
| CVE-2025-2082 | Tesla Model 3 VCSEC Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected Tesla Model 3 vehicles. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the VCSEC module. By manipulating the certificate response sent from the Tire Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS), an a | High 7.5 | 30 Apr 2025 |
| CVE-2024-13943 | Tesla Model S Iris Modem QCMAP_ConnectionManager Improper Input Validation Sandbox Escape Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escape the sandbox on affected affected Tesla Model S vehicles. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the QCMAP_Connection | High 7.8 | 30 Apr 2025 |
| CVE-2024-6029 | Tesla Model S Iris Modem Race Condition Firewall Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass the firewall on the Iris modem in affected Tesla Model S vehicles. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the firewall service. The issue results from a failure to obtain the xtables lock. An attacker can levera | Medium 5.0 | 30 Apr 2025 |
| CVE-2024-6030 | Tesla Model S oFono Unnecessary Privileges Sandbox Escape Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escape the sandbox on affected Tesla Model S vehicles. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute code within the sandbox on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the oFono process. The process allows an attacker to modi | High 7.0 | 30 Apr 2025 |
| CVE-2024-6031 | Tesla Model S oFono AT Command Heap-based Buffer Overflow Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected Tesla Model S vehicles. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute code on the target modem in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of responses from AT commands. The issue resul | High 7.8 | 30 Apr 2025 |
| CVE-2024-6032 | Tesla Model S Iris Modem ql_atfwd Command Injection Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected Tesla Model S vehicles. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the ql_atfwd process. The issue results from the lack of proper | High 7.8 | 30 Apr 2025 |
| CVE-2023-32157 | Tesla Model 3 bsa_server BIP Heap-based Buffer Overflow Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected Tesla Model 3 vehicles. An attacker must first obtain the ability to pair a malicious Bluetooth device with the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the bsa_server | High 7.5 | 3 May 2024 |
| CVE-2023-32155 | Tesla Model 3 bcmdhd Out-Of-Bounds Write Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected Tesla Model 3 vehicles. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute code on the wifi subsystem in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the bcmdhd driver. The issue results from the lack of proper val | High 7.0 | 3 May 2024 |
| CVE-2023-32156 | Tesla Model 3 Gateway Firmware Signature Validation Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected Tesla Model 3 vehicles. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute privileged code on the Tesla infotainment system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of firmware updates. The | High 8.8 | 3 May 2024 |
| CVE-2022-42430 | This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected Tesla vehicles. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the wowlan_config data structure. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing op | High 7.8 | 29 Mar 2023 |
| CVE-2022-42431 | This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected Tesla vehicles. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the bcmdhd driver. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a buffer. An a | High 7.8 | 29 Mar 2023 |
| CVE-2022-3093 | This vulnerability allows physical attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected Tesla vehicles. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the ice_updater update mechanism. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied firmware. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-C | Medium 6.4 | 29 Mar 2023 |
| CVE-2022-37709 | Tesla Model 3 V11.0(2022.4.5.1 6b701552d7a6) Tesla mobile app v4.23 is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass by spoofing. Tesla Model 3's Phone Key authentication is vulnerable to Man-in-the-middle attacks in the BLE channel. It allows attackers to open a door and drive the car away by leveraging access to a legitimate Phone Key. | Medium 5.3 | 16 Sep 2022 |
| CVE-2022-27948 | Certain Tesla vehicles through 2022-03-26 allow attackers to open the charging port via a 315 MHz RF signal containing a fixed sequence of approximately one hundred symbols. NOTE: the vendor's perspective is that the behavior is as intended | High 7.2 | 27 Mar 2022 |
| CVE-2020-9306 | Tesla SolarCity Solar Monitoring Gateway through 5.46.43 has a "Use of Hard-coded Credentials" issue because Digi ConnectPort X2e uses a .pyc file to store the cleartext password for the python user account. | High 8.8 | 18 Feb 2021 |
| CVE-2020-29438 | Tesla Model X vehicles before 2020-11-23 have key fobs that accept firmware updates without signature verification. This allows attackers to construct firmware that retrieves an unlock code from a secure enclave chip. | Medium 6.5 | 30 Nov 2020 |
| CVE-2020-29439 | Tesla Model X vehicles before 2020-11-23 have key fobs that rely on five VIN digits for the authentication needed for a body control module (BCM) to initiate a Bluetooth wake-up action. (The full VIN is visible from outside the vehicle.) | Medium 4.6 | 30 Nov 2020 |
| CVE-2020-29440 | Tesla Model X vehicles before 2020-11-23 do not perform certificate validation during an attempt to pair a new key fob with the body control module (BCM). This allows an attacker (who is inside a vehicle, or is otherwise able to send data over the CAN bus) to start and drive the vehicle with a spoofed key fob. | Medium 4.6 | 30 Nov 2020 |
| CVE-2020-15912 | Tesla Model 3 vehicles allow attackers to open a door by leveraging access to a legitimate key card, and then using NFC Relay. NOTE: the vendor has developed Pin2Drive to mitigate this issue | Medium 6.5 | 23 Jul 2020 |
| CVE-2020-10558 | The driving interface of Tesla Model 3 vehicles in any release before 2020.4.10 allows Denial of Service to occur due to improper process separation, which allows attackers to disable the speedometer, web browser, climate controls, turn signal visual and sounds, navigation, autopilot notifications, along with other miscellaneous functions from the main screen. | Medium 6.5 | 20 Mar 2020 |
| CVE-2019-9977 | The renderer process in the entertainment system on Tesla Model 3 vehicles mishandles JIT compilation, which allows attackers to trigger firmware code execution, and display a crafted message to vehicle occupants. | High 8.8 | 24 Mar 2019 |
| CVE-2016-9337 | An issue was discovered in Tesla Motors Model S automobile, all firmware versions before version 7.1 (2.36.31) with web browser functionality enabled. The vehicle's Gateway ECU is susceptible to commands that may allow an attacker to install malicious software allowing the attacker to send messages to the vehicle's CAN bus, a Command Injection. | Medium 6.8 | 13 Feb 2017 |
Original policy
Copied from bugcrowd.com on 12 Nov 2026. The summaries on this page are made from it; the live page may have changed since.
Description
Overview Tesla values the work done by security researchers in improving the security of our products and service offerings. We are committed to working with this community to verify, reproduce, and respond to legitimate reported vulnerabilities. We encourage the community to participate in our responsible reporting process. We will coordinate and communicate with researchers through the bug bounty process. For vehicle or energy products While we use Bugcrowd as a platform for rewarding all issues, please report vehicle and product related issues directly to [email protected], using our GPG key to encrypt reports containing sensitive information. Third-party bugs If issues reported to our bug bounty program affect a third-party library, external project, or another vendor, Tesla reserves the right to forward details of the issue to that party without notification to the researcher. Eligibility Note, Tesla's bug bounty program is in part facilitated through a third party (BugCrowd) who performs additional services and eligibility checks on our behalf. For example, Tesla may not issue payments if one or more of the following is applicable: You are a resident of a country under U.S. sanctions or live in a country that prohibits this type of program, You are under the age of 14 at the time of reporting, or between the age of 14 and 18 without explicit prior permission from a parent or guardian. You are currently (or were in the last 6 months) an employee of Tesla, a Tesla subsidiary, or third-party contractor with access to Tesla’s internal systems and networks. How the program works Security researchers and Tesla customers are encouraged to submit reports regarding the security measures used to protect Tesla products and services. When conducting security research, you are required to follow Responsible Disclosure Guidelines & Tesla’s Rules of Engagement (referred to as “Terms”), which are provided below. If a vulnerability is found, please document your findings thoroughly before sending them to us. This may include screenshots or videos of your findings. Members of Tesla’s team may contact you to confirm that we have received your submission, ask questions about your findings, and discuss how to reproduce them. Tesla may direct you to stop your activities in the event that your research impacts Tesla owned assets, Tesla vendors, or other customers. If directed to stop, you must immediately comply with the request. Tesla’s security team will then work with impacted business units to validate the findings. If Tesla can validate your findings and we determine that it is eligible for a reward under this program’s Terms, a bounty reward will be issued. You are responsible for the payment of all applicable taxes. TERMS Responsible Disclosure Guidelines We will investigate legitimate reports and make every effort to quickly correct any vulnerability. To encourage responsible reporting, we will not take legal action against you nor ask law enforcement to investigate you, so long as you comply with the Terms. Do not access or modify data that does not belong to you . If you are able to gain access to or modify data that belongs to Tesla, other customers, or Tesla vendors during the course of your research, you must take the following actions: Immediately stop your activities, Disclose your findings to Tesla as soon as possible (but no later than 24 hours after discovery). Your findings should include details of the vulnerability, including information needed to reproduce and validate the vulnerability and a Proof of Concept (POC), Wait for further instruction from the Tesla team. Make a good faith effort to avoid privacy violations, destruction of data, and interruption or degradation of our services. Give Tesla a reasonable time to correct the issue before making any information public. In certain circumstances, Tesla may request that you not disclose your findings or to delay disclosure until we can ensure that the matter has been adequately addressed. You may not disclose confirmed, unresolved vulnerabilities without approval from Tesla. Rules of Engagement Research must be done using your own account or Tesla products that you own. You should not intentionally modify online accounts, data or products owned by other Tesla customers (without explicit permission). If during the course of your research, you find a vulnerability that would allow you to bypass an authentication control for another person’s account, you should report the vulnerability to Tesla immediately and take no further action. If you are able to access or modify personal data of other customers or other sensitive data that does not belong to you, immediately contact Tesla. Do not attempt to conduct post-exploitation work with this data. Where you are able to access data that does not belong to you, you will be asked to delete it. You must comply with this request, demonstrate the steps you took to ensure it was deleted, and confirm deletion to Tesla in order to be eligible for a reward. Do not attempt to use brute force or denial of service attacks on Tesla-owned systems without prior written approval. Hardware Research Registration Hardware Research Registration: If you are performing good-faith bug bounty related research on hardware that you own (vehicles or Powerwall, for example), you must first register the hardware with Tesla via [email protected]. This is necessary to prevent warranty-related issues. Registering also permits Tesla to voluntarily support researchers by providing updates or a “reflash” of the researcher-owned vehicle or Powerwall.
Targets
When registering for an account, please use your [email protected] email address. Please refrain from spamming forms (order forms, contact forms, etc) with high numbers of requests. Focus Area Tesla's public facing web applications Vulnerabilities in other applications owned by Tesla Vehicles or product related issues must be submitted by email in order to qualify for a reward, see above for instructions The following findings are out of scope: Tesla account MFA issues are out of scope at the present time WAF bypass Open redirects / Lack of security speedbump when leaving the site Internal IP address disclosure Accessible Non-sensitive files and directories (e.g. README.TXT, CHANGES.TXT, robots.txt, .gitignore, WSDL, pprof, etc.) Social engineering / phishing attacks Self XSS Text injection Email spoofing (including SPF, DKIM, DMARC, From: spoofing, and visually similar, and related issues) Descriptive error messages (e.g. stack traces, application or server errors, path disclosure) Fingerprinting/banner disclosure on common/public services Clickjacking and issues only exploitable through clickjacking CSRF issues that don't impact the integrity of an account (e.g. log in or out, contact forms and other publicly accessible forms) Lack of Secure and HTTPOnly cookie flags (critical systems may still be in scope) Lack of rate limiting Login or Forgot Password page brute force, account lockout not enforced, or insufficient password strength requirements HTTPS mixed content scripts Username / email enumeration by brute forcing / error messages (e.g. login / signup / forgotten password) Exceptional cases may still be in scope (e.g. ability to enumerate email addresses via incrementing a numeric parameter) Missing HTTP security headers TLS/SSL Issues, including BEAST BREACH, insecure renegotiation, bad cipher suite, expired certificates, etc. Denial of Service attacks Out-of-date software Use of a known-vulnerable component (exceptional cases, such as where you are able to provide proof of exploitation, may still be in scope) Physical attacks against Tesla's Facilities / Property Relay or RollJam attacks pertaining to the keyfob, NFC card, and/or phone-as-key Adversarial modification of the vehicle's environment to confuse Autopilot We still monitor for and appreciate hearing from researchers on new or novel findings in this area
Additional information
We support the open publication of security research. We do ask that you give us a heads-up before any publication so we can do a final sync-up and check.
Vehicle Targets (in scope)
Payout Guidelines The following section shows the range of payouts along with specific examples of impact. Within a category, the amount will depend on factors such as how much owner interaction is required, the capabilities of a compromised process (in the case of code execution), and the quality of the report. The below examples are not meant to be an exhaustive list of all valid findings within the program, but are meant to provide some clearer high-level guidelines and inspiration to researchers. If you have a security issue to report to us that does not fall into the below categories, please do not hesitate to reach out to us with your findings. We will continue to update the table with relevant categories and their associated payouts. If a vulnerability falls into multiple categories, the highest severity applies. Critical ($50,000 - $100,000) Remote zero-click to unconfined root on infotainment Any remote code execution on a CAN-connected ECU, e.g. Autopilot, VCSEC, Gateway Infotainment pivot to CAN-connected ECU, e.g. Autopilot, VCSEC, Gateway High ($20,000 - $50,000) Remote one-click to unconfined root on infotainment Unconfined root persistence on infotainment or Autopilot Remote zero-click on lower-privileged peripherals (WiFi/BT firmware, baseband) Local privilege escalation from unprivileged process Moderate ($10,000 - $20,000) Unprivileged remote code execution on infotainment Unconfined root on infotainment or Autopilot via ethernet Unconfined root on infotainment or Autopilot via USB Zero-click radio module remote code execution Low ($500 - $10,000) Unprivileged persistence on infotainment or Autopilot Local drive authentication bypass PIN-to-Drive bypass We do not award bounties for: Relay attacks Hardware-based glitching and side-channel attacks Confusing Autopilot by modifying the environment, such as adding lines to the road (CWE-XKCD-1958 attacks) Tesla-specific known issues (e.g., publicly reported or previously reported by another researcher) Chromium and/or Webkit bugs, unless chained with a full sandbox escape Persistence and/or secure boot bypasses on Tegra-based infotainment systems Attacks that require physical access on Tegra-based infotainment systems Payout Factors If a vulnerability affects multiple systems, e.g. shared code, bounty will be determined by the highest single amount with a bonus determined at Tesla's discretion The bounty amount may be reduced if the attack is unreliable, relies on unusual conditions being met, etc. A working proof-of-concept will help ensure you receive the maximum applicable payout for your report Internal duplicates that are not yet fixed will still be rewarded at a reduced amount Vulnerabilities affecting Tegra-based infotainment systems are rewarded at Tesla's discretion, along with a reduced payout Superchargers and related infrastructure are out of scope We may at our discretion award payouts for CVEs in third-party code that affect us, provided it's an unknown risk and the report demonstrates impact. Root access program To promote further security research, Tesla offers security researchers the opportunity to retain root access on their infotainment system even after their reported vulnerability has been patched. In order to qualify, a researcher must send in a valid report describing a novel way to gain root access on a Tesla infotainment system. Upon confirmation, Tesla will instruct the researcher on how to use their existing root access to enable the researcher SSH feature, along with an SSH certificate for the researcher's public key (tailored to their specific hardware ID). The certificate restricts SSH access to the local diagnostic ethernet link. Tesla may renew the certificate as long as the researcher continues reporting vulnerabilities.