Vend.com

Vulnerability disclosure program on Self-hosted vend.com

Accepting reports Full safe harbor

Go to program Website

At a glance

What to know before you start testing.

What the company's own policy page says it pays.

This program does not pay cash rewards.

Pays cash: No We do not offer money or swag as rewards, but we will offer a place in our Security Hall of Fame
Safe harbor: Full Authorized in view of any applicable anti-hacking laws, and we will not initiate or support legal action against you for accidental, good faith violations of this policy;
Hall of fame: Yes we will offer a place in our Security Hall of Fame: https://vend.com/security-hall-of-fame.txt

Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original

14 assets you may test, 1 excluded.

Out of scope (1)

What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Vend.com's policy. "We" in these lines means the program, not this site.

Report any vulnerability you've discovered promptly;
Avoid violating the privacy of others, disrupting our systems, destroying data, and/or harming user experience;
Use only the Official Channels to discuss vulnerability information with us;
Handle the confidentiality of details of any discovered vulnerabilities according to our Disclosure Policy;
Perform testing only on in-scope systems, and respect systems and activities which are out-of-scope;
Limit the amount of data you access to the minimum required for effectively demonstrating a Proof of Concept; and cease testing and submit a report immediately if you encounter any user data during testing
You should only interact with test accounts you own or with explicit permission from the account holder; and
Do not engage in extortion.

Clickjacking on pages with no sensitive actions
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on unauthenticated forms or forms with no sensitive actions, e.g.: login/logout/search.
Attacks requiring MITM or physical access to a user's device.
Previously known vulnerable libraries without a working Proof of Concept.
Comma Separated Values (CSV) injection without demonstrating a vulnerability.
Missing best practices in SSL/TLS configuration.
Any activity that could lead to the disruption of our service (DoS).
Content spoofing and text injection issues without showing an attack vector/without being able to modify HTML/CSS
Rate limiting or bruteforce issues on non-authentication endpoints
Missing best practices in Content Security Policy.
Missing HttpOnly or Secure flags on cookies
Missing email best practices (Invalid, incomplete or missing SPF/DKIM/DMARC records, etc.)
Vulnerabilities only affecting users of outdated or unpatched browsers [Less than 2 stable versions behind the latest released stable version]
Software version disclosure / Banner identification issues / Descriptive error messages or headers (e.g. stack traces, application or server errors).
Tabnabbing
Open redirect - unless an additional security impact can be demonstrated
Issues that require unlikely user interaction

Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original

Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 6 hours ago.

No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.

Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.

Search NVD

No CVEs matched yet. We match NVD records by vendor name, so products sold under another name can be missing.

Rewards, scope and stats come from the company's own pages and are checked several times a day.
Policy text is summarised with AI. Every quoted line is checked word for word against the source before it is shown.
The program's own policy always wins. Read it before you test.

Original policy Report a mistake