- Top reward
- $50,000
- Top severity paid
- Critical
- Assets in scope
- 8
- Public CVEs
- 0
- Last change
- No changes yet
At a glance
What to know before you start testing.
- Pays up to $50,000
- for critical bugs.
- Report by email
- [email protected]
- Full safe harbor
- Good-faith research is authorised; no legal action.
- Replies within 3 days
- As the policy promises.
- Publish after a fix
- Coordinate the timing with the company.
Rewards
What the company's own policy page says it pays.
| Severity | Relative size | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| Critical |
|
$50,000 |
| High |
|
$20,000 |
| Medium |
|
$6,000 |
| Low |
|
$3,000 from $250 |
- Top reward
-
$50,000
Critical │ RCE, command injection │ 50,000
- Response
-
Within 3 days
We'll confirm receipt of your submission within 72 hours.
- Safe harbor
-
Full
We won't pursue or support legal action against researchers acting in good faith under this policy.
- Hall of fame
-
Yes
First valid reporter of a finding that triggers a code or config change earns a spot in our Hall of Fame .
Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Scope
8 assets you may test, 7 excluded.
Domains 3
- compare.wagwalking.com
- pets.wagwalking.com
- wagwalking.com
Android apps 2
- Wag! app (iOS/Android)
- Wag! Walker app (iOS/Android)
iOS apps 2
- Wag! app (iOS/Android)
- Wag! Walker app (iOS/Android)
Wildcard domains 1
- prod-*-api.wagwalking.com
Out of scope (7)
- Attacks requiring physical device access
- Findings affecting only third-party services outside Wag!'s control
- Network-level DoS / DDoS
- Physical security testing (office access, tailgating, hardware attacks).
- Social engineering, phishing, or vishing of any Wag! person or user.
- Systems not listed in the scope above
- UI/UX bugs and spelling mistakes
Rules
What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Wagwalking's policy. "We" in these lines means the program, not this site.
While testing
-
Don't compromise user privacy, degrade the service, disrupt production, or alter/destroy data.
-
Stay within the in-scope assets below. If you're unsure, email us before testing.
-
Keep findings confidential during the 90-day embargo period (or until we confirm the fix, whichever is sooner).
-
Use only test accounts you own. If you accidentally encounter real user data, stop and disclose that in your report.
-
Don't submit raw automated scanner output without manual validation.
-
Don't book walks, use promo codes, or interact with real users or walkers as part of testing.
-
Don't perform social engineering, phishing, or vishing of Wag! employees, contractors, or users.
-
Don't share PoC material publicly until coordinated disclosure is complete.
Not accepted
-
Password/account recovery policies
-
Missing SPF, DMARC, or DKIM records
-
Spam reports
-
Vulnerabilities only affecting outdated browsers or OS versions
-
Clickjacking on static or public pages
-
Missing security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.)
-
Descriptive error messages or stack traces
-
HTTP 404s, banner disclosure, robots.txt
-
CSRF on unauthenticated forms
-
Autocomplete / save-password browser behaviour
-
Missing Secure or HttpOnly flags on non-session cookies
-
Weak or missing CAPTCHA
-
Username enumeration via login or password reset
-
OPTIONS / TRACE HTTP methods enabled
-
Deprecated TLS versions (1.0/1.1) without demonstrated impact
-
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
-
Self-XSS
-
CSV / formula injection in data exports (no RCE on Wag! systems)
-
Missing security.txt
-
Rate limiting on non-sensitive, public endpoints
-
Missing SameSite cookie attribute without demonstrated impact
-
Host header injection without a demonstrated exploit (SSRF, cache poisoning, etc.)
-
Open redirect without a demonstrated exploit chain
-
Missing DNSSEC
Summarised with AI from the company's policy, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original
Changes
Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 5 hours ago.
No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.
Public CVEs
Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.
No CVEs matched yet. We match NVD records by vendor name, so products sold under another name can be missing.