Skip to content

Tor Browser

By Tor Project Bug bounty on Sorona torproject.org

Accepting reports open-source
Top reward
$2,500
Top severity paid
High
Assets in scope
7
Public CVEs
53
Last change
No changes yet

At a glance

What to know before you start testing.

Pays up to $2,500
for high bugs, from $125.
Partial safe harbor
Some legal protection; read the terms.
Replies within 3 days
As the policy promises.
Public disclosure allowed
You may publish your report.

Rewards

What Sorona lists as the payout for each severity.

Severity Reward
High $2,500
Medium $1,250
Low $125
Response
Within 3 days ~3 days First response
Safe harbor
Partial Sorona will not pursue legal action against you for good-faith research submitted to us in line with this policy. We cannot speak for the upstream project, its vendor, or any third party, and we do not grant authorization on their behalf.

Summarised with AI from the program policy on Sorona, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original

Scope

7 assets you may test, 7 excluded.

Web 1

  • https://www.torproject.org/download

Products and areas 6

  • Bootstrapping and connection assist: the Tor Launcher path, bridge configuration and the pluggable transports the bundle integrates, obfs4 and Snowflake among them
  • The browser as shipped, meaning the whole Gecko engine as Tor patches it: the content process and its sandbox, SpiderMonkey, the networking stack, the extension surface and the add-ons the bundle ships
  • The program pays for supported versions of two products only, the Tor daemon and Tor Browser. This page is the Tor Browser asset row: the Gecko fork at gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser, graded up to critical, on the latest stable, alpha and nightly builds
  • The Tor Browser patch set itself: first-party isolation, the fingerprinting-resistance work, the security-level slider and the invariant that no traffic reaches the network outside the SOCKS proxy
  • The updater and the signature checking behind it, which is the path an attacker would take to ship a build a user already trusts
  • Tor Browser on desktop across Windows, macOS and Linux, and Tor Browser for Android, all carried by that one asset row
Out of scope (7)
  • Defects that reproduce unchanged in stock Firefox, which are Mozilla's code and get filed against Mozilla; the Tor Browser CVE record is small for that reason
  • Model-generated findings submitted without manual verification and a working proof of concept, and the program also wants you to name the model you used
  • Orbot, OONI and Tor Messenger, the other Tor Project products the scope list marks ineligible
  • Reports sent by email rather than through HackerOne, which the policy treats as forfeiting the bounty
  • The tor daemon itself, which the same program pays on its own asset row at up to $4,000 critical and which this row does not cover
  • The Tor Project's hosted services, meaning torproject.org, the bug tracker and the server infrastructure, which the policy rules out by name
  • Unsupported and end-of-life builds. Supported means the latest stable, alpha and nightly, so a bug that only reproduces on an older release earns nothing

Rules

What the policy asks of you, and the bug types it won't reward, quoted from Sorona's policy.

While testing

  • Submit through sorona.xyz first.
  • Test only supported versions: the latest stable, alpha and nightly builds
  • AI-assisted findings need manual verification and a working proof of concept, and you must disclose which model you used
  • Say which of the two paid assets you hit: Tor Browser and the Tor daemon are priced on separate rows
  • File through HackerOne rather than email

Not accepted

  • Defects that reproduce unchanged in stock Firefox
  • Model-generated findings submitted without manual verification and a working proof of concept
  • Reports sent by email rather than through HackerOne

Summarised with AI from the program policy on Sorona, read 12 Nov 2026, and checked word for word against it. Read the original

Changes

Tracked since 11 Nov 2026. Last checked 1 hour ago.

No changes yet. When the rewards or scope move, you will see it here and in the RSS feed.

Public CVEs

Published vulnerabilities in this vendor's products, from the NVD.

Search NVD
CVESeverityPublished
CVE-2026-77642 High 7.5 20 Aug 2026
CVE-2026-77641 Medium 6.5 20 Aug 2026
CVE-2026-77584 High 7.0 20 Aug 2026
CVE-2026-77587 Medium 5.9 20 Aug 2026
CVE-2026-77638 High 8.9 20 Aug 2026
CVE-2026-77639 Medium 5.3 20 Aug 2026
CVE-2026-77640 Low 3.7 20 Aug 2026
CVE-2026-44601 Low 3.7 7 May 2026
CVE-2026-44602 Low 3.7 7 May 2026
CVE-2026-44603 Low 3.7 7 May 2026
CVE-2026-44600 Low 3.7 7 May 2026
CVE-2026-44599 Low 3.7 7 May 2026
CVE-2026-44597 Low 3.7 7 May 2026
CVE-2023-23589 Medium 6.5 14 Jan 2023
CVE-2022-33903 High 7.5 17 Jul 2022
CVE-2021-46702 Medium 5.5 26 Feb 2022
CVE-2021-39246 Medium 6.1 24 Sep 2021
CVE-2021-38385 High 7.5 30 Aug 2021
CVE-2021-34549 High 7.5 29 Jun 2021
CVE-2021-34550 High 7.5 29 Jun 2021
CVE-2021-34548 High 7.5 29 Jun 2021
CVE-2021-28089 High 7.5 19 Mar 2021
CVE-2021-28090 Medium 5.3 19 Mar 2021
CVE-2020-15572 High 7.5 15 Jul 2020
CVE-2020-10592 High 7.5 23 Mar 2020
CVE-2020-10593 High 7.5 23 Mar 2020
CVE-2020-8516 Medium 5.3 2 Feb 2020
CVE-2015-2688 High 7.5 24 Jan 2020
CVE-2015-2689 High 7.5 24 Jan 2020
CVE-2015-2928 High 7.5 24 Jan 2020
CVE-2015-2929 High 7.5 24 Jan 2020
CVE-2019-13075 Medium 5.3 30 Jun 2019
CVE-2019-12383 Medium 4.3 28 May 2019
CVE-2019-8955 High 7.5 21 Feb 2019
CVE-2017-16639 Medium 4.3 14 Sep 2018
CVE-2018-16983 Critical 9.8 13 Sep 2018
CVE-2016-9079 High 7.5 11 Jun 2018
CVE-2018-0490 High 7.5 5 Mar 2018
CVE-2018-0491 High 7.5 5 Mar 2018
CVE-2016-1254 High 7.5 5 Dec 2017
CVE-2017-16541 Medium 6.5 4 Nov 2017
CVE-2017-0380 Medium 5.9 18 Sep 2017
CVE-2017-0377 High 7.5 2 Jul 2017
CVE-2017-0375 High 7.5 9 Jun 2017
CVE-2017-0376 High 7.5 9 Jun 2017
CVE-2016-8860 High 7.5 4 Jan 2017
CVE-2014-5117 Medium 5.8 30 Jul 2014
CVE-2012-2249 Medium 5.0 3 Feb 2014
CVE-2012-2250 Medium 5.0 3 Feb 2014
CVE-2013-7295 Medium 4.0 17 Jan 2014
CVE-2012-5573 Medium 5.0 1 Jan 2013
CVE-2012-4419 Medium 5.0 14 Sep 2012
CVE-2012-4922 Medium 5.0 14 Sep 2012

Original policy

Copied from sorona.xyz on 12 Nov 2026. The summaries on this page are made from it; the live page may have changed since.

Skip to content What this pays sorona.xyz pays 1.25× the program's reward, up to +$1,000 per finding, plus a complexity bonus of up to $1,000 for especially complex or well-chained bugs. Finding │ Program pays │ Through sorona.xyz Critical (Tor Browser asset row) │ $3,000 │ $3,750 High │ $2,000 │ $2,500 Medium │ $1,000 │ $1,250 Low │ $100 │ $125 Submit a vulnerability CVE history 0 Last 12 months 5 Lifetime Info disclosure 40 % Access control 20 % Parsing/validation 15 % Denial of service 10 % Latest advisories Loading the feed Overview Tor Browser is the Gecko fork built for anonymity, and it is small by install count next to Chrome or Firefox, single-digit millions of daily users, but exceptionally high consequence per user. It is the deanonymisation-resistance layer for journalists, dissidents, researchers and investigators, and the reference implementation of fingerprinting resistance that both Mullvad Browser and Brave's Tor mode build from, so a proxy-bypass or fingerprinting defect here carries a physical-safety impact profile rather than a data-loss one. The Tor Project pays for it on HackerOne out of a pool funded by the Internet Bug Bounty, and the Tor Browser asset row runs $100 for a low through $3,000 for a critical. sorona.xyz adds 1.25× on top of whatever the Tor Project awards, up to $1,000 more, plus a complexity bonus of up to $1,000 for a well-chained finding. Response times ~3 days First response not published Triage ~10 days Bounty In scope The program pays for supported versions of two products only, the Tor daemon and Tor Browser. This page is the Tor Browser asset row: the Gecko fork at gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser, graded up to critical, on the latest stable, alpha and nightly builds Tor Browser on desktop across Windows, macOS and Linux, and Tor Browser for Android, all carried by that one asset row The browser as shipped, meaning the whole Gecko engine as Tor patches it: the content process and its sandbox, SpiderMonkey, the networking stack, the extension surface and the add-ons the bundle ships The Tor Browser patch set itself: first-party isolation, the fingerprinting-resistance work, the security-level slider and the invariant that no traffic reaches the network outside the SOCKS proxy Bootstrapping and connection assist: the Tor Launcher path, bridge configuration and the pluggable transports the bundle integrates, obfs4 and Snowflake among them The updater and the signature checking behind it, which is the path an attacker would take to ship a build a user already trusts Out of scope The tor daemon itself, which the same program pays on its own asset row at up to $4,000 critical and which this row does not cover The Tor Project's hosted services, meaning torproject.org, the bug tracker and the server infrastructure, which the policy rules out by name Orbot, OONI and Tor Messenger, the other Tor Project products the scope list marks ineligible Unsupported and end-of-life builds. Supported means the latest stable, alpha and nightly, so a bug that only reproduces on an older release earns nothing Defects that reproduce unchanged in stock Firefox, which are Mozilla's code and get filed against Mozilla; the Tor Browser CVE record is small for that reason Model-generated findings submitted without manual verification and a working proof of concept, and the program also wants you to name the model you used Reports sent by email rather than through HackerOne, which the policy treats as forfeiting the bounty Most-valued findings A proxy bypass that puts traffic on the network outside the SOCKS proxy. It defeats anonymity outright and is the shape a critical takes here A deanonymisation primitive built on fingerprinting: any signal that tells one Tor Browser user apart from the rest of the population, since the defence only holds while everyone looks identical First-party-isolation breaks that let a site correlate a user across two other sites. Info disclosure is 40% of this asset's recorded distribution, the largest class on it Access-control failures in the Gecko patch set that reach a resource the anonymity model is supposed to keep partitioned, 20% of the record Bridge and pluggable-transport flaws that reveal a user is connecting through Tor at all, which in some jurisdictions is the entire risk Program rules Submit through sorona.xyz first. We validate, coordinate with the program's security team, and add the payout uplift on top of whatever it awards. Test only supported versions: the latest stable, alpha and nightly builds, all of which the scope row links directly AI-assisted findings need manual verification and a working proof of concept, and you must disclose which model you used Say which of the two paid assets you hit: Tor Browser and the Tor daemon are priced on separate rows, and the daemon pays more at critical File through HackerOne rather than email, which is the channel the program treats as the bounty-eligible one Rewards are funded by the Internet Bug Bounty, whose own intake has been paused since 27 March 2026; Tor's program is still open and paid $1,800 in the last 90 days, but confirm the pool before committing heavy effort Program stats 68 Reports resolved $20.5k Bounties paid 51% Response efficiency Disclosure Coordinated through The Tor Project on HackerOne, and unusually open about it: nothing in the policy restricts third-party involvement or requires written consent before you talk about a fixed bug. The program goes further and states that policy-compliant research is authorized conduct it will vouch for if someone else comes after you, so sorona.xyz can carry the report end to end and publication timing stays a conversation between you and Tor. Safe harbor Sorona will not pursue legal action against you for good-faith research submitted to us in line with this policy. We cannot speak for the upstream project, its vendor, or any third party, and we do not grant authorization on their behalf. You are responsible for understanding and following the laws that apply to you, wherever you are, and for staying within any scope the project has defined. Submit a vulnerability